Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Sugar

Sir.—Shades of poor Oliver Twist! I think Mr Skinner, president of the Federation of Labour, should be warned that Mr Beadle has been appointed editor of ‘The Press." Mr Big Business can go on the rampage with high profits and big take-overs, but should little Oliver, the worker, ask for more, Mr Beadle and all the little Beadles ate overcome and hold up their hands in pious horror —Yours, etc. I S. W. AYERS. I January 24. 1964.

Sir.—ln support of ‘’Housewife.” I agree that talk of a general wage order is ridiculous and will only bring up the prices of other goods, not affected by the rise in sugar prices. The solution is simple and only needs a little selfcontrol; go without! Cut down on our intake, and give up sweets, ice-creams, and soft drinks. Eat raw fruit and get our sugar that way. Diabetics can do it—so can we. Our health—and our waistlines—will be much better for it. And soon we will find the price of sugar will be forced down. Who knows? The day may come when shopkeepers are giving their sugar away.—Yours, etc., GO WITHOUT. January 24. 1964.

Sir,—Strangely enough, no voice is raised to praise the Government for keeping the price of sugar down until now. They have done a very good job, I think. Just now. a lot of sugar is used for cooking fruit, jam and bottling. But, speaking generally we. would be far better in health if we used less suger, as Britain found during the war years. Less sweets, biscuits, and cakes, and more whole meal cookery and raw fruit would be a great improvement. A further suggestion is >that brown sugar should be sold in quantity at a cheaper rate than white. Being less refined it should be cheaper.— Yours, etc.. ANOTHER HOUSEWIFE. January 24, 1964.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19640125.2.9.1

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30348, 25 January 1964, Page 3

Word Count
307

Sugar Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30348, 25 January 1964, Page 3

Sugar Press, Volume CIII, Issue 30348, 25 January 1964, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert