LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29245, 1 July 1960, Page 8

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

L Letters sent to the Editor tor printing must be written in ink on one sidd' of the paper only, and writers must send in their names and addresses tn full, whether they wish these to be printed or not S Writers must say clearly whether or npt their letters are being or have been sent to other capers 3. i*he Editoi cannot - return eor Keep any letter which for any reason is unsuitable for printing. nor can he acknowledge unsuitable letters, although this will be done where it seems to be needful, or enter into any ■ correspondence € Letters must not be of more * than 150 words tn length - Tolerance.—Letters limited to 150 words. St. Cuth’s.—“Unusual” does not “imply” uniqueness. Also Hard Up.--Suggest you give the organisers time to prepare their proposals. Old-Tirper.—No space for a discussion of modern art and sculpture. McCarthy Admirer.—We hope you will read the book by Richard H. Rovere, reviewed on the literary page on April 30. Eunuff. —Unless you show that the word was misapplied (and it was presumably used in the sense of “weaken”) your complaint must be limited to the speaker’s tiresome repetition of it. Practical Matters.— Sorry; we were too cryptic. The point we wished to make was that the selection of a Suitable and adequate site for a town hall is primarily a town-planning matter (on which architects are. of cgj^ s ®} qualified to speak). This, in view, should be the responsibility of someone who knows local conditions and r «^ u if e ™ ents „,?"d has studied the probable course of . future civic development.