Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FERTILISER INDUSTRY

Minister Replies To Mr Stevens

(New Zealand Press Association) WELLINGTON, July 4. No formal approach had been made to the Government by the fertiliser industry for decontrol, but if one were made it would receive proper consideration, the Minister of Industries and Commerce (Mr E. H. Halstead) said today in commenting on a statement by Mr L. J. Stevens, chairman of the Dominion Fertiliser Company, on behalf of his and three other

companies. “I do not regard as a proper approach Mr Stevens’ public statement, which raises the question of decontrol in a context of a Price Tribunal decision and of an allegation that the Government is, in some way, favouring a farmers’ co-operative company.” Mr Halstead said. “The Price Tribunal is an independent, judicial body. If the fertiliser industry has fresh evidence to submit as to its position, the proper course is for it to approach the tribunal.”

Mr Halstead denied that the East Coast Farmers’ Fertiliser Company was Government-owned, as Mr Stevens claimed. The full extent of Government interest in the company, he said, was a shareholding, small in relation to the total capital, held by the Lands Department. Farmers drawing on the company for supplies were required to be shareholders, and similarly the Lands Department, which was a farmer by virtue of its land development programme, had a shareholding to ensure access to supplies of fertiliser.

The further point raised by Mr Stevens was the loan made to the company by the New Zealand Meat Producers’ Board. This money came from the industry reserve fund and the loan was within the general policy of using the industry funds for the benefit of the industry, Mr Halstead said. The Price Tribunal said today that it had no comment to make on the increase of 18s a ton in the price of superphosphL.c granted the Napier works. At most other works the increase has been 7s a ton.

The New Zealand Meat Board tbday confirmed that the East Coast Farmers’ Fertiliser Company, owner of the Napier works, was using about £960,000 in loan money advanced by the board at 2$ per cent, interest.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19570705.2.117

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCVI, Issue 28321, 5 July 1957, Page 12

Word Count
356

FERTILISER INDUSTRY Press, Volume XCVI, Issue 28321, 5 July 1957, Page 12

FERTILISER INDUSTRY Press, Volume XCVI, Issue 28321, 5 July 1957, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert