Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£65,000 CLAIM AT WESTPORT

Evidence By Mine Technician

(New Zealand Press Association) WESTPORT, April 12. In the course of the hearing of the mining case at Westport by Mr Justice Adams in the Supreme Court today the technician at the mine at Stockton under dispute. John W. Duncan, admitted that there had been occasions when the coal had been contaminated by shale but in small amounts. The case concerns the claim by Thomas Moynihan and Wilfred J. Slee for £65,000 from the Crown for cancellation of their coal mining lease at Stockton. There is a counter-claim for £11,200 for alleged damage by Moynihan and Slee to Crown property.

Duncan said he had no mining tickets but had been extensively engaged in hydraulic mining work in recent years as an associate of the Moynihans. He said that Thomas Moynihan, Slee and he himself had been amongst those interested in the Comet mine in the Buller Gorge on which the company had lost some thousands of pounds after three and a half years’ operations when the coal ran out.

Cross-examined by Mr H. A. E. Maitland, junior counsel for the defence. Duncan denied that the directors of the Nile hydro mine at Charleston had got rid of him. He said, that had been engaged on certain work there with Thomas T. Moynihan and it had proved so successful that the company had ceased working at a loss and had paid a 25 per cent, dividend after the first year of their operations. They had been bought out at a reasonable price because of dissatisfaction of one director. The witness corroborated other evidence about coal handling and freedom of pollution of Mangatine creek from the plaintiff’s mining operations. Further reference was made today to the claim that the defence was not interested in the quality of coal. “What happened yesterday was merely an indication of an unfortunate misunderstanding between junior counsel and it has now been cleared up without further embarrassment to the Court,” said Mr Justice Adams.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19570413.2.11

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28252, 13 April 1957, Page 2

Word Count
335

£65,000 CLAIM AT WESTPORT Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28252, 13 April 1957, Page 2

£65,000 CLAIM AT WESTPORT Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28252, 13 April 1957, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert