Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMPENSATION COURT

WIDOW’S CLAIM FAILS

A claim by Margaret Frances Purdie, a widow, of Christchurch, for compensation for the death of her husband, Robert Purdie, has been disallowed by Judge Dalglish in the Compensation Court.

Pjtrdie, who died on June 4, 1953, was formerly a mental hospital attendant. ?n-l while so employed contracted tuberculosis. It was claimed that the tuberculosis resulted in his death and that the widow was accordingly entitled to compensation.

“On a consideration of the whole of the medical evidence it is my view, and I find as a fact, that Purdie died from heart failure, and that the extent to which tuberculosis could have contributed to that heart failure was at the most very small indeed,” said Judge Dalglish m his reserved judgment yesterday. “The enlargement of the heart was probably a substantial factor in the heart failure. The hemorrhage from the duodenal ulcer was probably another substantial factor. The tuberculosis may have been a very minor factor contributing to the enlargement of the heart, but that enlargement was due prinbipally to emphysema, which was not caused by tuberculosis, but was caused by bronchitis and asthma. I do not consider that tuberculosis could have contributed towards the heart failure in any other way than through its influence on the enlargement of the heart. Its influence, if any, towards the enlargement of the heart could only have been very minor. I am unable, therefore, to hold that the tuberculosis contributed to Purdie’s death to any material degree. “Plaintiff has failed to establish her claim for compensation and defendant is accordingly entitled to judgment. Leave is reserved to defendant to apply for costs.” Evidence in the case was taken in Christchurch in October and December last year, and in Wellington on April 6 this year. Mr L. G. Rose appeared for Mrs Purdie, and Mr G. W. Matthewson for the defendant, the Attorney-General.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19550528.2.134

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume XCI, Issue 27670, 28 May 1955, Page 9

Word Count
315

COMPENSATION COURT Press, Volume XCI, Issue 27670, 28 May 1955, Page 9

COMPENSATION COURT Press, Volume XCI, Issue 27670, 28 May 1955, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert