Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HIGHER FREIGHT RATES

CARGO WORKERS DENY BLAME

NEW AUCKLAND UNION ISSUES STATEMENT (New Zealand Press Association)

AUCKLAND, September 15. Members of the Auckland Cargo Workers Union say they are not in any way responsible for any alleged increases in shipping companies’ costs which might justify the 10 per cent, increase in shipping freights from New Zealand to Britain and Europe, which was announced last evening. In a statement to-day, the executive of the union quoted figures to show how shipowners had been saved money by faster cargo handling since the union had been formed. Factors beyond the control of the union might well be the real reason for any inefficiency at ports, the statement said. If that was so, the burden of higher charges should be borne by those responsible, not by the whole of New Zealand. •

The statement said the union had offered to help shipowners to moke economies by doing over-all contract work for all types of cargo, but the offer had been rejected. The employers had said they would not be prepared to consider such a system for at least twoyears. "The executive committee makes a strong and energetic denial of the allegations against New Zealand port workers inferred in the statement by Mr D. A. Robertson, chairman of the Overseas Shipowners* Allotment Committee,” the statement began. It was evident from the three main reasons given for the increase in freight charges that the employers placed a high degree of blame for the increase on the additional cost of labour and the slower turn-round cf ships. The statement said that the men in Auckland, as at other ports, were working full hours, with no spelling or other restrictive practices. Compared with the previous practice of working an hour on and an hour off on full pay, that alone must show 100 per cent, greater economic efficiency. It was not true that the turn-round of ships was slower, said the statement. For the Waipawa, for example, which began loading on May 12, the saving in stevedoring costs was estimated at £2600, and in wharf dues and port fees about £4200. The Waipawa loaded about 10,400 tons of cargo, and was loaded in six days lass than it would have been loaded last year. The Rangitiki. which completed loading on Wednesday, was turned round in three fewer working days than when she was at Auckland in November, 1950. the statement added. No figures were yet available, but it was believed that the ship was carrying a record load.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19510917.2.52

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26528, 17 September 1951, Page 6

Word Count
419

HIGHER FREIGHT RATES Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26528, 17 September 1951, Page 6

HIGHER FREIGHT RATES Press, Volume LXXXVII, Issue 26528, 17 September 1951, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert