Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CARE OF ANIMALS

Sir, —Until the annual meeting of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals on the evening of November 29, the society had thought that it was highly desirable that there should be one society only dealing with the colossal problems that confront any organisation trying to improve the lot of our dumb animals. What arguments induced the society to the willing acceptance of two societies in the city, doing the same w’ork? Surely greater efficiency and economy, along with a larger and more enthusiastic public support, would ensue from the pooling of talents and resources. Is it that the one society obstinately refuses to place the interests of the animal first, and that the other society has weakly and pitiably surrendered what was a very strong case? —Yours, etc., H. ANDERSON. December 22, 1949.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19491223.2.127.5

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXXXV, Issue 25994, 23 December 1949, Page 10

Word Count
139

CARE OF ANIMALS Press, Volume LXXXV, Issue 25994, 23 December 1949, Page 10

CARE OF ANIMALS Press, Volume LXXXV, Issue 25994, 23 December 1949, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert