THE WEATHER

Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21404, 21 February 1935, Page 9

THE WEATHER

To THE EDITOR OK THE PnESS. Sir—l apologise to "Will-o'-the-Wiip" for hurting his feelings by taking liberties with his nom-de-plume, but really he should have given more thought to his choice of a pen-name it 1 er h '- 0t t° , in y ite criti cism. As it v.js he asked for it." I do not agree vath his spectacular denouncement of such criticism as being one clmmit VV °r St Sln w 3 corres Pondent can cxmmit. I wonder if he has mv authority for that assertion, or whether ur/ S for Cre th^° n ° f hiS - ° Wn * con jured "P for the convenience of the Mged'feelings er l ° BV ™ hls Z r S„X' a os Ss'Jfc SS K'"; hav,n!! ™thcT yirrekponsible facetious streak in my makef' l i L-" jU m rGSist tho temptation to tdke liberties with such an inn'ri ncm-dc-plume. and hoocd he SC i' the h f umorcus side 4, of the n'ist'u. -1 afraid 1 was too optito bo 3 rathcr risk >' thill S r,r ! i: , COn . C i ,USion '. a fcw wo "ls on one PTiii)° 'i ! Cl pomts - In regard to dognon nvil CmCTt } 1 think this asser-»DDf-irpriofieift If my statements applied unduly dogmatic, they were fnr rne<int to be s0 > but one cannot be for ever qualifying everything one would make tiresome read- ? afrai „ d -. Further, if I did not m^M C * w sufficiently clear that my mciiiod was still incompletely de- ■ - oped, then I admit my fault in this faction. but wcu!d jjJ 1q t Q th s ;. 1 I" m , y ear , letter, dated Janu- - :n, ,L q '» ICd mv by rm-. , j y could not be all ru. anteed to bo experienced locally. Ell °\ histor >'- two out of had the rain i.j on '- v remains - will happen on (he lost ■ •1-* rneiuiOiird. If that is fulfilled mv PWentugc of -uccesgps m t y r • CYCLONE fcoruary 20, 1^35. IThis correspondence is now closed Ed., "The Press."]