Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEAVE REFUSED

TEACHER WHO WISHED TO TRAVEL DECISION OF WELLINGTON EDUCATION BOARD (ntlss ASSOCHTION TBMSQIUI!.) WELLINGTON, August 15. Leave of absence to travel abroad and to visit especially Grectt Britain and Russia has been refused a teacher, Mr M. Riske, by the Wellington Education Board, which declined to-day to lescind a previous motion rejecting his application. The application had been considered by the board previously in committee, and came before it yesterday as a notice of motion by Mr Robertson to rescind the decision. Mr Robertson said he thought the board would be guilty of political bias if Mr Riske were not granted the leave without pay which he requested. Colonel T. W. McDonald said Mr Rake's application was supported by the Educational Institute, which was a very strong recommendation, and by many other bodies. He was a highly educated man and wished to go abroad to improve hia knowledge of education. When a man was prepared to devoto six months of his time without pay to such a purpose he should be encouraged unless it was known that he had an ulterior motive. Colonel McDonald appealed to members not to allow bias against certain social philosophy to be the basis of their decision. That bias was not In accord with the march of events in world affairs. Great Britain and other great countries of the world had now recognised Russia. He was told Mr Risko harboured communistic opinions. His parents had been political refugees from the old regime in Russia, and it was natural that he should want to visit that country. Mr W. E. Gascoigne said that tha man was either fit to be a teacher or not. If they permitted teachers generally to go abroad, they should not make rui exception without special knowledge. They could not presume that he would assimilate the worst ideas that he encountered, and even if he did give trouble when he came back he could be dealt with. The motion was defeated by eight votes to five.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19340816.2.151

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21244, 16 August 1934, Page 17

Word Count
336

LEAVE REFUSED Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21244, 16 August 1934, Page 17

LEAVE REFUSED Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21244, 16 August 1934, Page 17

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert