Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ON LICENSED PREMISES

«—— INTERPRETATION OP WORD "FOUND" (riISS iiSOCIiTIO* TEI.HMAM.) NELSON, May 28. Whether the term "found" to describe persons on licensed premises after closing hours means found by a police officer, or whether the evidence of other persons that the defendant was there could be taken as proof of the fact, was a point on which Mr T. E. Maunsell, S.M., and SeniorSergeant Peterson found themselves at variance. The magistrate considered it was necessary for a person to be found by a police officer. He convicted and discharged the defendant concerned, who was proved to be found on the premises on the evidence of the licensee. In doing so he said he did not agree with the Crown Law Office on the matter, which should go to the Supreme Court for argument. The conviction, however, should not be taken as a precedent.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19340528.2.24

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21175, 28 May 1934, Page 5

Word Count
143

ON LICENSED PREMISES Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21175, 28 May 1934, Page 5

ON LICENSED PREMISES Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21175, 28 May 1934, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert