Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHARFAGE RATES

REDUCTION ON PRIMARY PRODUCE SUGGESTED REPORT OF TREASURER At a special meeting of the Lyttelton Harbour Board held on December 20, on the resolution of Mr F. L. Parnham, the treasurer (Mr C. H. Clibborn) was asked to submit a report as to what reduction in wharfage charges could be made with a view to assisting the farming community. That report was submitted to the I meeting of the board yesterday, and in it the treasurer explained that the amount which resulted from the 5 per cent, reduction in wages, which is now in force, and which could be used to offset a reduction in wharfage dues, was about £2049. The estimates adopted on December 20 allowed for a credit balance of £222. The wharfage charges for 1933 on frozen meat, butter, cheese, tallow, hides, preserved meats, bacon, honey, etc., were 5d a ton; on grain and agricultural produce, they were 6d a ton; and on wool. 9d a bale. The total amount from those sources was £8822, or 36.6 per cent, of the total wharfage dues (£24,093). Previous Reductions. Reductions in charges amounting to £BI7B on goods, and £14,795 on ships were made in 1929, and shortly afterwards a concession amounting to £6OO was made to .overseas vessels. The treasurer stated that in 1929, before the slump, when the reductions were made, the ordinary income was £120,209. It fell in 1933 to £83,892, and the estimate for 1934 was £89,405. "The answer to the board's resolution, therefore," says Mr Clibborn, "is that if the wharfage receipts from primary products in 1934 equal those of 1933, viz.. £8922, and if the board is satisfied that the primary producer will directly benefit thereby it could reduce those charges bv some 75 per cent.—or roughly £6690 per annum to be offset only by the sum set aside for the special renewal fund—estimated for the year at £5000." As Mr Parnham was not present at the meeting, it was decided to hold over consideration of the report till next meeting.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19340208.2.49

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21084, 8 February 1934, Page 6

Word Count
339

WHARFAGE RATES Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21084, 8 February 1934, Page 6

WHARFAGE RATES Press, Volume LXX, Issue 21084, 8 February 1934, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert