Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROPOSED BOARD OF WORKS.

t SUGGESTION TO QTf i COUNCIL. 1 I CONFERENCE TO BE rn^n : Following a letter received ftg* u, Council of the United ciation, the City Coameil ' night to call a eoisfereeee «f bodies to diseais tho «j«eatisa t ting up a MetropoHtas BeitM Works. * The Burgesses' Assaeiatia* stating that at a recent J following motion had I unanimously:— , | i That the lime has aow j when it is desirable to fora ib. | politan Board of Works oi I in the City, for tie reasons: That a greater aud co-ordination of tie wk i ried out by the varices i in Greater Christcicrti is isKaJij, j in the interests of mer* eeassaattt ' local government adrainiatTSiiss. J Mayor's Vievs. j The .Mayor (Mr IX G. SsiHiTia, 3LJU j asked the Council to state j favoured a conference of Isal j to discuss the quentioa. or at ! | of ratepayers. He reminded j that the Governneat was ! Royal Commission to coaaisSey body administration. ir:si would be a good plan, to miit . report was made known I cring the matter. He Moved th» « ■ ference of local bodies discuss the problem. ■■■' In seeou'lin.,- the motion., Cr. MM: Andrews saiu .hat m Ms epiaosa.» good many people did sot what a Metropolitan Board of Vtik : meant. They were coafsstiaj it the Melbourne Metropolitan JBeaal £ Works, which dealt only iri£k lMj| supply and drainage. Witt 'egad. & the views stated by candidates City Council at the last & considered that many of Cant ihm mostly in favour of bringing' it Hilflti districts into the City raties tfeat Siting up a Board of Woris. I Public Utilities CcsmxStet Cr. J. McCombs said that 1m ttaofet that many people did not that there was at tha prejeat good deal of co-ordination aiaeag laat bodies. There was for instaanifhklW> lie Utilities Committee wfejei «MiSm a good deal of overlapplsg. fidtot ps matter was taken much fsaSisß- ; j| should be decided whether *3fittar politan Board of Works or aa«»sJWßa~ tion of local bodies was matter Of fact there tras wt gamation and co-ordinatioa is c-hureh than in any ether cfiy Zealand. JJWj It was decided to call a no date being fixed in tk« ißWiflHlrtfc: , g 1 m

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19320216.2.39

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20472, 16 February 1932, Page 8

Word Count
368

PROPOSED BOARD OF WORKS. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20472, 16 February 1932, Page 8

PROPOSED BOARD OF WORKS. Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20472, 16 February 1932, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert