EROSION AT SUMNER.
>ple of Swaner, having . • false mm of «ecurB*nt thai the "protec;o protect the sandhill*, llow the bailing of it if rather a reflection oa to be a**d to believe sd wJo porpose of the >t«ct the sandhill* and tbojwopJoconsideredso *li«wibatf Once that t will be there for »» >t beach on the seaward »n then wpeet at wojo >e excuse being wade to Ms, wd convert yet anour beaeh into * P*"** move reassuring me evidence of an *»«•»; set to the root of ■.»« we hear of nothing else" I. Could not the people hont Indulging w rarty but firmly, ta*.'*" 8 .-*}' rs that the rmning of stone walls will not be SUMNEB BBWABE. the changed »»<H£°"J «tat sea w«* b * */*";, direction of the channel ick aR near Shag Bock, nro the 0P' nlp " th *t *£ hange is dlroctlv w *nr tiding of the- wall np to may be said that it Jj. ,a lowerinsrthe 'levelI of louMfh ft r n v would havV former, must have Bome
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19300918.2.131.3
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 20036, 18 September 1930, Page 15
Word Count
168EROSION AT SUMNER. Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 20036, 18 September 1930, Page 15
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.
Log in