AN INTERESTING CORRESPONDENCE.
TWO EMPLOYERS OF LABOUR ON PROHIBITION.
BOTH FORMERLY FAVOURABLE
Louisville, Kentucky, 15th May, 1928
Dear Mr Raskob, — From your statements to the New York "limes" of April , 23rd, you have evidently given this matter of Prohibition a great deal of thought. Being an executive and an employer of labour, and having been an advocate, like yourself, of Prohibition for many vears, I must admit that the opposition of so many reputable leaders of public opinion in America against Prohibition has given me no little concern. I am truly interested in learning what you have in mind as a substitute for Prohibition.
Yours very truly, (Signed) P. H. CALLAGHAN
Note.—Mr Callaghan is > president of the Louisville Varnish Co. of Kentucky. Mr John J. Raskob is president of General Motors Corporation, and a director in a number of other corporations which in the aggregate employ over 300,000 workmen. Mr Raskob has a family of 12 children ranging from 5 to 12 years of age, and what he says in his reply to Mr Callaghan is that the thing that gives him the greatest concern is that both his employees and his children are developing "a thorough lack of respect for our laws, and institutions, and that there seems.to be a growing feeling that nothing is .wrong in life except, getting caught." •Further, in the course of his reply to Mr Callaghan he says this:—'A large number of people feel that a majority in this country have-no more right to curtail their freedom with respect to drinking beer, wines, or even spirits than they have to deny free religious worship. These people, feel they, do no wrong in the eyes of God when they buy and consume beer, j wines, and. liquors in spite of the law. ... I "The menace of prohibitory laws is the spirit of ■■ intolerance underlying their -adoption, and this is bound to result in rebellion. ,«,_..,. "My whole desire and effort is to try to bring my fellow-citizens back into the atmosphere that gave birth to our Constitution—an- atmosphere ol" brotherly love which spells tolerance and a keen respect for ourselves, for each-other, for. our-laws, institutions, and, above all, respect for our God. our liberty and our freedom. "No one can survey or study the results of the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Law during the past nine years without coming to the conclusion that their administration has been a complete failure. "I thoroughly resent the charge by over-zealous Prohibitionists that those of us engaged in trying to bring about the repeal or amendment of the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Law are in any way lawbreakers or show any lack of respect for our great Constitution. On the contrary, we ure engaged' in a noble effort to restore to our people a feeling of independence and liberty and the right to the pursuit of happiness so earnestly sought, prayed tor, and finally secured after the great revolutionary war. "Let us not have another revolution or rebellion, which is certain to overtake us unless we learn how to build. our laws on the foundation of honesty instead of intolerance, and also let us appreciate the fact -at the might of the majority or an organised minority is not necessarily right. . . . "My judgment is that both parties will dodge this whole liquor question by inserting some innocuous plank in their respective platforms at the June conventions. "Sincerely yours, "(Signed) JOHN J.- RASKOB."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19281108.2.73
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19462, 8 November 1928, Page 9
Word Count
574AN INTERESTING CORRESPONDENCE. TWO EMPLOYERS OF LABOUR ON PROHIBITION. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19462, 8 November 1928, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.