Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN INTERESTING CORRESPONDENCE.

TWO EMPLOYERS OF LABOUR ON PROHIBITION.

BOTH FORMERLY FAVOURABLE

Louisville, Kentucky, 15th May, 1928

Dear Mr Raskob, — From your statements to the New York "limes" of April , 23rd, you have evidently given this matter of Prohibition a great deal of thought. Being an executive and an employer of labour, and having been an advocate, like yourself, of Prohibition for many vears, I must admit that the opposition of so many reputable leaders of public opinion in America against Prohibition has given me no little concern. I am truly interested in learning what you have in mind as a substitute for Prohibition.

Yours very truly, (Signed) P. H. CALLAGHAN

Note.—Mr Callaghan is > president of the Louisville Varnish Co. of Kentucky. Mr John J. Raskob is president of General Motors Corporation, and a director in a number of other corporations which in the aggregate employ over 300,000 workmen. Mr Raskob has a family of 12 children ranging from 5 to 12 years of age, and what he says in his reply to Mr Callaghan is that the thing that gives him the greatest concern is that both his employees and his children are developing "a thorough lack of respect for our laws, and institutions, and that there seems.to be a growing feeling that nothing is .wrong in life except, getting caught." •Further, in the course of his reply to Mr Callaghan he says this:—'A large number of people feel that a majority in this country have-no more right to curtail their freedom with respect to drinking beer, wines, or even spirits than they have to deny free religious worship. These people, feel they, do no wrong in the eyes of God when they buy and consume beer, j wines, and. liquors in spite of the law. ... I "The menace of prohibitory laws is the spirit of ■■ intolerance underlying their -adoption, and this is bound to result in rebellion. ,«,_..,. "My whole desire and effort is to try to bring my fellow-citizens back into the atmosphere that gave birth to our Constitution—an- atmosphere ol" brotherly love which spells tolerance and a keen respect for ourselves, for each-other, for. our-laws, institutions, and, above all, respect for our God. our liberty and our freedom. "No one can survey or study the results of the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Law during the past nine years without coming to the conclusion that their administration has been a complete failure. "I thoroughly resent the charge by over-zealous Prohibitionists that those of us engaged in trying to bring about the repeal or amendment of the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Law are in any way lawbreakers or show any lack of respect for our great Constitution. On the contrary, we ure engaged' in a noble effort to restore to our people a feeling of independence and liberty and the right to the pursuit of happiness so earnestly sought, prayed tor, and finally secured after the great revolutionary war. "Let us not have another revolution or rebellion, which is certain to overtake us unless we learn how to build. our laws on the foundation of honesty instead of intolerance, and also let us appreciate the fact -at the might of the majority or an organised minority is not necessarily right. . . . "My judgment is that both parties will dodge this whole liquor question by inserting some innocuous plank in their respective platforms at the June conventions. "Sincerely yours, "(Signed) JOHN J.- RASKOB."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19281108.2.73

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19462, 8 November 1928, Page 9

Word Count
574

AN INTERESTING CORRESPONDENCE. TWO EMPLOYERS OF LABOUR ON PROHIBITION. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19462, 8 November 1928, Page 9

AN INTERESTING CORRESPONDENCE. TWO EMPLOYERS OF LABOUR ON PROHIBITION. Press, Volume LXIV, Issue 19462, 8 November 1928, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert