THE COURTS.

Press, Volume LXI, Issue 18308, 16 February 1925, Page 5

THE COURTS.

I* MAGISTERIAL.;

p..-'- ;:.;■, ,:.V ; r BAtUBDAT.'K:; ; "; N tTJeforo Mr H. SM.) fc snd et»«toty first offender for Mrunkeapeas.were.. s eaci convicted and fined p«, in deiault'Si hotifii' impn'aoninent. !«*.?&■,* st ' offeiidp*jwho had been bailed Sp-s.w,)the, lock-up in tho sum of 20*,-was «G§Yww< ujd, fined that amount, in default Jgpaours' imprisonment,'' mL v court. > Jflfea young lads appeared and pleaded not FjP'? '? * Jomt charge of having stolen a Tallied at 255. jjlpfr been Stolen off' a bicycle afi™g*/«a concert; hall by ope oftho boy*. ajHßEjioya gave evidence, and cyich blamed 95BSW** f« .the theft <>f it.- . However, one having received, the .lamp to have heon jjaHßpb.;agiingt the boy ftho admitted ■^gra^H v lna '* m P wa * adjourned for faring which tiino he is to V^JIIJHHtv 0 absolute discretionary control * waßrafflßation Officer. Special conditions ■tjgfjkwihe lad Temams with his unci* on iJOT«If£N"ph Canterbury, and that he i» : «ity except fdr medical treatother .boy was; dismissed.

IplSpBR PLACES, BpTteE; ; GRANTS. Wj«i gf» dihich Claude Oswald McWf(6ti«a»y. fined JE2ft or a month C-wfPtWWW on ■■» lacecouiae, wa» nea invCkiUrt to-day, Mr J. W. jffi*fipii'jfv«*id a' mistake had been outside the Court. He ft twßt'Tustices had underatood that L*l!l^ s i ,rev i9ualy been fined for a, wm not correct. • He °n Friday next, and AGAINST- ;V K»Ps|BgOCIATIW ,: TBUSBBi«.) ' M i,p4NGANUI. February J5. a* ijlfiireroe Court, the widow of i .Percfval Cricks waa awarded £SOO Martin and Vewon, taxi B*»?>M2ifc*eo,u»i. t© the recent fatal

IrsuAL':CAsk ;■■ ase came before the Chief bert- Stout) at Wellington: ien the question.was raised on of an illeßitiraato .child > estate of parents or grandntestate. The action was, Arthur Winch and the Pubhe Attorney-General being' red that the estate in queflit £236. Three parties wore grandmother, her daughter, ftr'a illegitimate son. Tho 1306, and the grandmother intestate. The son wis tha k; ,of tha crandwother ,to belonged. The son claimed i-Vthe ..question was «s to Id claim the estate, being? riting under section <? of ersens' Administration' Act. fho Eoint is that there -was »{f 'to the Rrandrabtber, «d in her mother's lifetime. ?:a« to whether the illegitiW»ed when the grandmother as.heard, the hearinqr being 1, argument, after bearing] ur reserved his dscision.