Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ARMOUR LICENSE.

j to tsb noroß or "ibb fsess." , Sir,—Will you kindly insert this letter io fmylir™ |W|^ In your rtport of tbe mooting in Wellington* -where a deputation met Mr Masse; «JsingVth&& Armour and Co. be given a license, I am reported as Baying: "Who were the people opposing the granting of a license? They were in noftfJy nil cases connected with frcczioavaskß.in^Canterbwj." what I said was: "That nearlv all opposition, directly or indirectK, tamo from freezing works."

In Canterbnrr 90 per cent, of tho farmers were in favour of granting a license. Personally, I;do not- Know that any Canterbury Company has actively opnosed tii© Armour license-—Ynurs. otc , JOHN GBIW. Christchurtih, December 4th.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19211205.2.71.4

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17320, 5 December 1921, Page 10

Word Count
115

THE ARMOUR LICENSE. Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17320, 5 December 1921, Page 10

THE ARMOUR LICENSE. Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17320, 5 December 1921, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert