SATURDAY'S MATCHES.

Press, Volume L, Issue 14984, 3 June 1914, Page 11

SATURDAY'S MATCHES.

The following aro the teams, grounds, and referees for next Saturday's matches: — Seniors—Linwood v. Old Boys, Oval, Mr W. Woods; Christchureh v. Canterbury College, South ground, Mr J. D. Fraser; Albion v. Sydenham, Sydenham Park, M-r W. Duggan; Merivalo v. Mari&ts, West ground, Mr R. W. Brittan.

Juniors —Albion v. Merivale, Albion, Mr L. Hardie; North Canterbury v. Canterbury College, Canterbury College. Mr T. Bond; Sydenham v. Old Boys, Old Boys', Mr C. Evans; Christchureh v. Maricte, Ma_ists', Mr. T. Ennis; Linwood v. Lyttelton, Lyttelton, Mr A. Alexander. President's Cup—Canterbury College ▼. Merivalo B, Merivale, Mr W. Russell; Merivalo A v. Albion, C.R.U. No. 2, Mr F. Schmidt, Kaiapoi v. Sydenham, Sydenham, Mr A. Martin; Belfast v. Marists. C.R.U. No. 1, Mr J. Weston; B.H.S. v. Old Boys, B.H. School, MV H. C. Harrison; Christchurch v. Christ's College, Christ's College, Mx G. S. M-thews.

Fonrth Class —North Canterbury v.' Albion, Rangiora, Mr 11. C. Wilson; Sumner v. B.H. School, Sumner, Mr L. Selwood; Linwood v. Lyttelton, Linwood Park, Mx E. G. Watkins; Kaiapoi v. Marists, Kaiapoi, Mr C. J. Tonkin; Merivalo v. Old Boys, Christchurch irround, Mr A. T. Donnelly. Fifth Class—Lyttelton v. Eastern, Lancaster Park; Telegraph v. Western, Lancaster Park; Sydenham v. Waltham-Marists, Lancaster Park;' Northern a bye. •ELLESMERE RUGBY SUB-TJNTOJ*. At a meeting of tbe Ellesmcro Rngby SubUnion, held at Lccston, Dr. Withers (president) presiding, the secretary reported having written to the Leeston and Dwnsandel Clubs regarding applications mado for reinstatement, and stating that, with the exception of a verbal etatement from the secretary of the. TLoeeton Club, to tho effect that tbe players for whom his club has applied foreinstatement were not competent to play seniors, ho had not received any reply. T_e Union did not approve of the action of tho abovo clubs in not replying to th© request for reasons supporting their applications. It wa-B decided, howeveqr, that tie applications should be granted. The following is tho draw for the second round:—Seniors —Juno 13th: College v. Leeston, at- Leeston; Dnnsandel v. Irwell, at Dunsandei. June 27th: Lcoston v. Dunaandel, at Leeston; -College v. Irwell, at Irwell.■•■

Junior Competition—Juno 13th: Springstoi v. Southbridge, at Springston; College v. Dunsandel, at College; Dwell v. Leeston, _t Irwell. June 20th: College v.Leeeton, at Leeston; Southbridge v. Irwell, at Southbridg«; Dunsandel v. Springston, at Dunsandel. June 27th: Lceston v. Springston, at Siixingston; Southbridge- v. Dunsandel, at Dunsandel; C-ollego v. Irwell, at College. July 4th: . Springston v. Irwoll, "at Irwell; College v. Southbridge, at College; Leeston v Dunsandel, at Leeston. July nth: Lcceton v. Southbridge, at Leeeton; Iransojidel v - Irwell, at Dunsandel; College v. Springston, at Springeton.