AN IMPORTANT APPEAL CASE.
A BIASSED MAGISTRATE. Press Association— Br Telegraph— Copyright Melbourne, September 18. An appeal was recently lodged against the conviction of a hotelkeeper for selling on Sunday on the ground that Mr Loriner, J.P., who formed one of the Bench, had persisted in adjudicating in spite of a protest that he was biassed in the temperance interests. The full Court upheld the appeal, and ordered the case to be reheard. The Chief Justice, in delivering judgment, after referring to the finding of the Board appointed some time ago to enquire into charges against the Magistrates, said that if objection was taken where there was tangible ground for suspicion their duty was to retire at once. The Court thought there cculd not be a moment's doubt as to the impropriety of Mr Lormor's presence in this case. Furthermore, in the face of the findings of the Board and Mr Lormer's attitude in various matters, fair minded persons might come to the just suspicion that Mr Locmor was biassed, and such suspicion made his presence illegal.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18970920.2.36.1
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume LIV, Issue 9836, 20 September 1897, Page 5
Word Count
177AN IMPORTANT APPEAL CASE. Press, Volume LIV, Issue 9836, 20 September 1897, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.