Allardice v. Tansley and Others.
vruuers. » -■■ — (per pkess association.) ax n Wau »Bra», This day. M the Supreme Court iu banco before Sir R. Stout, Chief Justico, the , case Allardice v. Tansley and others was argued. This was an action for a prohibition to prevent the Clerk of the Court at Dannevirke, S. Tansley, from ls '" l S s * dißtre ss warrant iu the case at Allardice v. Mortenaen and Co. in which Thomas Tanner, oup of the letendautß, succeeded and was allowed »sts. The motion was made ou the jround that Allardice had another udgment in the Supreme Court igainst Mortonsen and Co. for a rreater amount. There was gome lonflict of evidence bs to whether the udguieutin the first case was in favor if Morfiensen and Co. or Tanner His louor said that a» there was a conflict if evidouee he was bound to beliova ha Magistrate. Tho reoord book could » altered now and Thonas Tauner's ame inserted in the oolumn, and it cjiild be reiuitiailed by the MagistVate. lie Magistrate could attend the proeedingaeven now if it WKa ntomM. %££T£Ztr for prohibition I
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BA18990928.2.7
Bibliographic details
Bush Advocate, Volume XII, Issue 1753, 28 September 1899, Page 2
Word Count
186Allardice v. Tansley and Others. Bush Advocate, Volume XII, Issue 1753, 28 September 1899, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in