Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FILM FINANCE.

SECRET INQUIRIES.

LOSSES OVER £3,000,000. j DISCLOSURES EXPECTED.

(Special.—By Air Mail.) LONDON, June 17. Sensational disclosures are expected following secret investigations now taking place into the whole field of British film finance. The investigation is being made in consequence of losses of over £3,000,000 last year, eaya the "Daily Herald." Mr. W. C. Crocker, well known for his exposure of the great London fire conspiracy, is acting in the investigation on behalf of an important client. A remarkable feature of the situation is the refusal of certain re-insurance companies to meet their guarantees under the scheme of guaranteed loan finance which, last year, provided independent film companies—in many cases with interlocking directorates— with mortgage loans totalling over £4,000,000. Wasteful Expenditure. It ie understood that the re-insurance companies are refusing to pay cm the grounds of misrepresentation on the part of certain intermediary parties, and the use of loans for purposes other than provided for under the contracts. The re-insurance companies claim that they guaranteed the money for financing specific films, but that a portion of the money has been used in wasteful genera] expenditure at the studios. They also claim that intermediaries arranging the business fniled to inform them that the money was to be need for general expenditure, though they were aware that tins was the ease. Reasonable Risk. If this information had been given them, they would not, they state, have accepted the business, since, while the possible failure of a specific film is a reasonable insurable risk, general expenditure on production companies ie not. Early this year the "Big Five" banks refused to go on with the scheme of independent company film finances owing to the big losses in which insurance companies were already involvedThis drastic action precipitated the present crisis in the insurance underwriting world, though the banks must be held largely responsible, as they allowed themselves to become partners to the arrangements in the first instance. Sheer Muddle. Fantastic and wasteful expenditure on production has characterised several of the spectacular studio flotations in the last two years. Films have been made under, conditions of eheer muddle and lack of organisation, with enormous overheads in the form of studio staffs, stars and executives. Last year, it is alleged, at least £1,000,000 of the £4.000.000 spent in our studios was wasted.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19370706.2.75

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 158, 6 July 1937, Page 8

Word Count
386

FILM FINANCE. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 158, 6 July 1937, Page 8

FILM FINANCE. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 158, 6 July 1937, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert