Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PEER TAKEN TO TASK.

Viscount Elibank and Return Of German Colonies. OPINION IN THE DOMINIONS. (Received n a.m.) LONDON, January 8. "I make no claim to know better than Sir George Pearce, Federal Minister, what popular opinion in Australia is regarding the Commonwealth being prepared to assist in settling this very vexed question—whether to hand back or otherwise German New Guinea to Germany in a comprehensive scheme under which other colony-owning nations would do their part," declared V iscount Elibank when the Australian Associated Press showed him Sir George Pearce's criticism of the statement made by Lord Elibank that he thought the people of Australia and New Zealand favoured the return of German colonies

"I only stated a general impression I gained on my recent three weeks' visit to Australia," he added. "In any event I hope Sir George Pearce read my letter in full before finally advising the Commonwealth to turn down my proposals."

Lord Elibank's letter, published in "The Times" recently, drew the ire of Sir George Pearce, who said that "the Commonwealth Government knew more about Australian opinion that did Lord Elibank, who had spent only a few days travelling in the country." Sir George added that it would not be correct to say that Australia did not feel very strongly about the return of German New Guinea, against which Australian opinion was definitely and absolutely set.

Lord Elibank bad suggested in hie letter that lie found in Australia, New Zealand | and Canada the general opinion that the German colonial claims could be met, and that it would be folly to risk another European war through not dealing with them. He said: "I believe that if the peace of Europe was at stake New Zealand would not feel very strongly about the return of Samoa, or Australia about Xew Guinea. Japan might even be persuaded to return some of the mandated islands in the Pacific, while Holland has huge undeveloped areas in Xew Guinea, and might be able to help. Portugal also has territories, whose inhabitants need not suffer by a change of mastership." Lord Elibank concluded by suggesting that a committee of experts be established by the colony-owning nations to consider the matter.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19370109.2.84

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1937, Page 9

Word Count
367

PEER TAKEN TO TASK. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1937, Page 9

PEER TAKEN TO TASK. Auckland Star, Volume LXVIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1937, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert