Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LANG'S DISMISSAL.

Governor's Action Challenged In New Book. INDETERMINATE PRIVILEGES. LONDON, September 28. Sir Philip Game's dismissal of Mr. J. T. Lang from the Premiership of New South Wales in May, 1932, is challenged by Mr. Justice Evatt, of the High Court of Australia, in a book, "The King and His Dominion Governors," published by the Oxford University Press. The book is, in effect, a plea that the reserve powers of the Crown should be reduced to known and positive prin-

ciples. Mr. Justice Evatt says that if the propriety of actions such as that of SixPhilip Game is carefully and dispassionately considered, it will become reasonably plain that the power of dismissal can hardly be regarded as properly exercised if a Governor justifies it merely by reliance upon Ministers having broken the law, and a competent •legal tribunal is available to determine the question of legality and issue appropriate orders and injunctions to see that they are enforced. He is of opinion that, the difficulties existing in the British Dominions include the following:— (1) Uncertainty of the extent and conditions under which the Sovereign or his representative possesses the right to refuse a dissolution of Parliament to Ministers. (2) The power of dismissal of Ministers possessing a majority of the popular Assembly's confidence is not precisely ascertained. (3) The power of the Crown or its representative to insist upon a dissolution against Parliament's and the Ministers' will is also undefined. (4) The conditions of exercise of the prerogative of the appointment of peers in the United Kingdom cannot be precisely stated. (5) The ultimate right of the Sovereign or his representative to veto legislation is still asserted to exist. (6) There is no clear understanding regarding the * precise constitutional relation t'" 1 PriMic Minister or!.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19361003.2.59

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 235, 3 October 1936, Page 9

Word Count
296

LANG'S DISMISSAL. Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 235, 3 October 1936, Page 9

LANG'S DISMISSAL. Auckland Star, Volume LXVII, Issue 235, 3 October 1936, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert