Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT GROUPED.

BLOOD AT LAKEY'S. COUNSEL'S CRITICISM. Mr. Northcroft then made another attack on the blood stains as evidence, on the ground that no effort had been made to ascertain to which group they belonged, thus identifying them with any particular person. The fact that all human blood fell into one of four groups was most useful to medical science in the detection of crime. For instance, if a man was murdered with a knife, and the blood-stained knife was thrown away, tests could be made to show whether that blood coincided with that of the man suspected of murder or of the victim. The murderer might say that it was his own blood on the knife. This could be scientifically proved by the grouping test, and if it was proved that it was not the suspect's blood, then it was of supreme importance. In the case of the blood found about Lakey's place and on Bayly's sledge and trousers., and the microscopic portion on his knife, if that blood had been grouped, it could have been shown whether it was Bayly's or not, or that of his children or wife. The blood at Lakey's could have been grouped, and so could Mrs. Lakey's, but this was not done. Dr. Gilmour had attempted to justify himself 'by saying that blood could not be grouped if only a small stain was found, yet Sidney Smith, in his classic on forensic medicine, said that if the test was applied, any unknown stain could be identified.

Mr. Xortheroft criticised Dr. Gilniour for not taking the ordinary precautions or : preserving a sample of the blood he tested, to allow of the defence making a check test, if not in New Zealand, then in Australia. On the teste carried out by t-ho pathologist**, the jury was asked to lind important things. ''But remember, gentlemen of the jury, that you have to winnow the grain from the chaff, that you have to get facts and not mere unstable opinions."

When the Court was about to adjourn at 1 p.m., his Honor asked counsel if he thought tlio jury would be able to go to Kuawaro to-morrow.

Mr. Xortheroft: Yes, sir, I'm quite sure they will.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19340621.2.78

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 145, 21 June 1934, Page 8

Word Count
369

NOT GROUPED. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 145, 21 June 1934, Page 8

NOT GROUPED. Auckland Star, Volume LXIV, Issue 145, 21 June 1934, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert