Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN UNUSUAL MOTION.

DISMISSING A PETITION.

POSITION' OF 00-RESI'OXDEXT.

An unusual motion came before Mr. Justice Stringer in the Supreme Court this mornins. when Mr. G. P. Finlay, on behalf of Hilda Olive Johnston, respondent, and William Gilbert., carpenter. Te Kuhi. co-respondent, applied to have a suit for divorce entered by William Johnston dismissed for " ant of prosecution.

}Ir. Finlay stated that the action wa? brought up several sessions ago at Hamilton. The co-respondent been served and an answer had been filed, but nothing had been done. Counsel for the petitioner had been -written to, and urged to bring the case for hearing, but he had not replied. In the meantime the co-respondent, who was a reputable man. had this hanging over his head.

Mr. W. Noble. Te Kuiti. counsel for the petitioner, stated that the whole cause of the non-proeecution "was that the respondent had cleared out with t'.ie two children, and had not been found. Exhaustive inquiries had been made, but no trace of her could be found. He had definite knowledge that the co-respondent knew where she was, and he had reason to believe that she was travelling under another name. If the other side would tell him where she was he would be prepared to go on with tne case. His Honor: How is it that you don't reply to letters?

Mr. Xoble said he had told Mr. Finlay's agent in Te Kuhi that he was stiil looking for the respondent. It was his opinion that the co-respondent knew where the respondent was. and was keeping her out of the way.

His Honor: Yon can'T say that. This case cannot remain indefinitely. You can get on by substituted service.

Mr. Noble said that if he wa? given time he would do that. If the co-respond-ent was a reputable man hi? solicitors conld tell where the respondent was. His Honor: You are only assuming that, and I will adjourn this case for two weeks. Application is to he made for substituted service on the respondent, supported by an affidavit, and if that fails the suit will be dismissed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19260621.2.47

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 145, 21 June 1926, Page 6

Word Count
351

AN UNUSUAL MOTION. Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 145, 21 June 1926, Page 6

AN UNUSUAL MOTION. Auckland Star, Volume LVII, Issue 145, 21 June 1926, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert