Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUSSELL DIVORCE CASE.

BROTHER-IN-LAW'S EVIDENCE. A TALK WITH RUSSELL. (Received 1.30 p.m.) LONDON, March 9. In Lhe Russell divorce ease, the jury occupied five minutes with inspection of the baby. A brother-inlaw of Mrs. Rr.ssiil! stated in evidence, that he discussed the child with Russell, who said "It might be mine: I can't understand it." Witness asked "Can you honestly make any man a co-respondent." Russell replied "Xo, 1 believe- Chris is perfectly straight." Witness thought Russell wa»' easily influenced. Mrs. Russell was one of the bravest girls. She oared not what anybody said or thought or her. The respondent's mother is expected to be the last witness.—l A. and N.Z. Cable.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19230310.2.23

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 59, 10 March 1923, Page 5

Word Count
112

RUSSELL DIVORCE CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 59, 10 March 1923, Page 5

RUSSELL DIVORCE CASE. Auckland Star, Volume LIV, Issue 59, 10 March 1923, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert