RUSSEL DIVORCE SUIT.
CO-RESPONDENTS CLEARED. CASE TO BE RE-HEARD. LONDON", July 23. In the Rueeell divorce euit, the jury found that adultery had not been proved between the respondent and the two corespondents named, but disagreed on the question of adultery with a man not known. The Judge eaid that the caa« would be put back into the list on a charge of adultery with a man not known. —(A. and N.Z. Cable.) j
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19220724.2.49
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume LIII, Issue 173, 24 July 1922, Page 5
Word Count
74RUSSEL DIVORCE SUIT. Auckland Star, Volume LIII, Issue 173, 24 July 1922, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in