NOT A STRIKE.
OKXY A BREACH OF COIETKACT. WATERSIDE WORKERS' CASE DECIDED. (By> Telegraph.—Press Association.) "• - TVEIiLDJGTOX, thw day. Mr.. Erddell, S.M., gave reserved judgment to-day in the proceedings by the Leiour Department against cis waterside workers, who, it was alleged, become parties to a strike by workers engaged discharging tha steamer Dalmore, who refused to work for leas than 2/ an hour, tt-hich rate eventually had to be paid by Messrs. Scales and Co.
The Usigistrate said the case was similar to that of Gohns v. the Auckland Waicrside Union, but in that caee both, parties were bound, by an atcardIn the present ■case the employers were not parties to the award, and defendants' acts came within the definition of a etriko, but, as the employers were not parties to the defendants were merely guilty of a breach o! contract, .ami conld not be convicted of an offence under section 5 of the Coneiliati6n Arbitration Act. The information was disnpesci
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19160208.2.8
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XLVII, Issue 33, 8 February 1916, Page 2
Word Count
160NOT A STRIKE. Auckland Star, Volume XLVII, Issue 33, 8 February 1916, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in