WHY MRS. HULLEN DISPENSED WITH ELECTROLYSIS.
"I wan. nn<! am etlll. an «ipert In Electro; tsls." said Mrs. Hullen In the course of an Interview, "but I'm glad to 6fly I don't ueed to practise it. Electrolysis Is not nearly so efficient as Rusma for removing superfluous hair. Electrolysis Is painful, and no matter how skilfully done every Insertion of the hot needle must leave a little cicatrice—a white scar—Just as any other wound will show after healing. Bu:. with my Improved Rusma treatment, nn needle Is used, consequently no scar CAN lie left. In fact, the skin Is clonred ■and softened and Improved. And I GUARANTEE a cure with Rusma. I've scores of testimonial*. ,, Mrs. Flulleu invites all superfluous hair sufferers to c n 'l or write. Mrs. Hullpii. Beauty Specialist, Koulcott Ftreet. Wellington. Pept. 2.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19150227.2.142
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XLVI, Issue 50, 27 February 1915, Page 19
Word Count
137WHY MRS. HULLEN DISPENSED WITH ELECTROLYSIS. Auckland Star, Volume XLVI, Issue 50, 27 February 1915, Page 19
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in