SUPREME COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLIV, Issue 29, 3 February 1913, Page 7

SUPREME COURT.

CIVIL LIST FIXTURES. ! His Honor Mr. Justice Edwards and ' hi? Honor Mr. Justice Cooper presided at the Supreme Court this morning to fix da tns for the hearing of the civil bu.-ine-ss. The following list was decided ■ upon : — [Before a Comnion .'ury of four.) William Pierpont Black (Mr. Newton) v. N.Z. Federation of Labour and Alexar. lor fJr.« <- Mr - O'Regan), for £450, alleged Zibel. Tuesday, February 4, 10 a.m.: TTiomas Walsh (Mr. Newton) v. N.Z. Kc.'era.i.ion of Labour and Alexander (.:u"7 (Mr. O'Ueuani. £450 damages, a!..'..'' , 1 I!-el. February 4. 10 a.m. i Before i t oni:nun Jury of twelve.) ",.i., i;.i!.md Hartnell (Mr. Kted, K.i .. ,i:i'i Mr. Enii-am v. Osmond -las. M.-:v, r'i i Dr. Bamford and Mr. Pren- ■ l-rtri-i . •_ I i in -ppi-ial damages, Ll.iJ'i'l ;rnei:i! damage;., for iii|iirics rej.i'.vrd through alleged negligence, Moallefore a -ludge alone.) I Thomas Lowes (Mr. Innes) v. Frank I r;.iodine i \lr. Miller), £150, amount jal.ej;ed -~. lie ilue on s.Uc of land. (To ; ,■•■ mi ft lon' I lateri. 'l.u|vi Tour.i Timber Company, Lid. J i Mr. i'.eedi >. l.piiiur.l D. Lislu (Ali>on and Alison), £:il."» l "J 1 0, gooua supplied, Wednesday, Kebrnnry .">. Uuhcrt -lames \Vi!k:u-.i:i :Mr. Dcvorci v. Marcus Noble >kelu>n (Mr. Reed, K.i I, to revoke prnhatp srauted to delendant. [To be moutioned later.) Chrstina Danzey I Mr. v. William Mona™han (Mr. Reed, K.C. t, £200 . daniapes. alleged blander. (To be men-

lioned Ijip.-i. W. H. Murray and Co. (Mr. Zinian) v. Henry Wakeford Wilding (Mr. Burton), I order that trusts of dred be performed. (Decree to be drawn up, and submitted !to judge For approval). ' J Clara Agnes Lockie (Mr. Nicholson) v. I Frederick Ball and Thomas Ball (Mr. J Singer), £200 damages, alleged breach jof contract. (Appointment to be made i later). Adjourned. The following cases were adjourned uutil nexx sittings:—Moore Filter Company (Mr. Coleman) v. Talisman Consolidated. Ltd. (Mr. Hannal, injunction, etc. Joel Smith (Mr. Skelton) v. James Collett (Mr. Napier). £200 damages, alleged intimidation and injunction.

James Miller (Mr. Skelton) v. James Collett (Mr. Napier), £250 damages, alleged intimidation and injunction. Struck Out.

The ease Dan Quinlan (Mr. Skelton) v. Roy Seccombe, £220 damages for alleged slander, was struck out. DIVORCE LIST. The. following applications for dissolution of marriage have been set down for ■hearing at the present civil sittings of I the Auckland Supreme Court:— Martha Steuart v. Basil Steuart. Josephine Chapman Brisrgs v. Michael BriggsAlbert Edward Julian v. Sarah. Julian and Frederick McGregor. Lucy Winnifred Reid v. James Arthur Keid. * , AdoljA F. W. Lorie t. Sarah Ellen Lorie. Mary 'Evelyn Aitkeh v. Thomas Aitken. As it was not 'expected that the divojfce '- cases would be readied titio morning, none of the counsel engaged were in a position to ■proeeeii, and the Court hid to adjourn until this afternoon, owing to lack of any business to go on with. TIME XOT EXPIRED. The first divorce case called on this afternoon, before his Honor, Mr. Justice Edwards, wao that in which Josephine OhapmaJi Briggs applied fox the dissolution of her marriage with Michael Brigge. His Honor held that in calculating *he 42 daye that must elapse since the time of service of the petition, it had been held that the period of the Court vacation could not foe coumted in. He therefore ruled that *he case could not come on, but gramted counsel's application that the case be allowed to stand down until later in the session. ALLEGED MISCONDUCT. Albert Edward Julian, a barman residing in Auckland, for whom Mr. W. E. Haekett appeared, applied for a. divorce from his wife, Sarah Julian, on the ground of misconduct, Frederick McGregor being joined as co-respondent. Julian said he was married in 1901 and lived at Mangatainoko, Inglewood, and Hamilton. They then came to Auckland, and subsequently three years ago he went to Inglewood to start a livery and bait stable. His wife refused to with. -him. and remained with her mother, who kept a boarding house. There was one child of the marriage, a boy, born in 1905. About eighteen months ago witness came to Auckland . His wife admitted that she had been living with the co-respondent. ( Case proceeding.)