CONYNGHAM DIVORCE CASE.
Tin-: WIFE"? PETITION. ißy Telegraph. Press Association ) WKLUM.'TOW this day. Memories iif a sensational divorce case heard in Sydney ill 1901, were revived by a trial which commenced in the Supremo Court today, when Mice t'onynjjham .-urd for divorce from her husband, Arthur Ccmynfjlnim. on tin ground of a'luln-ry. The on.-i- i- be::i? heard before Mr. .ln-iti" . Chapman and :i jury. An application to have the cur heard ill i-ann-ra w.i> drvlim-d. the j;iil;( stating that lie might have In order thai some 01 the evidence shoilld not hr published. KcspotidiMit asked that a crow-petition should be heard at the s.ime time, but his Honor -aid the matter was not «el ilown. and he could not try it. Petitioner. ; n her evidence, said c ':ir war- married in Sydney in 15.):.. There were throe children of the marriage, and she lived with her husband until 1!>00. when they separated for a time. About three years ago re-pondent went away. He had not really maintained her for twelve years. Petitioner also pave pvi deniT of occurrence-' which led her to snippet her husband's misconduct. The cu>o is iirocccdin-r.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19120513.2.45
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XLIII, Issue 114, 13 May 1912, Page 5
Word Count
190CONYNGHAM DIVORCE CASE. Auckland Star, Volume XLIII, Issue 114, 13 May 1912, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in