S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLII, Issue 217, 12 September 1911, Page 6

S.M. COURT.

(Before Mr C. C. Kettle, S.M.) UNDEFENDED CASES. Orders for payment were made in the following summonses for debt:—Smith and Gaugbey (bid.) v. A. Hammond, £8 10/10; C. Mills and iSon v. C. M. Jotutnsc.ii, £8 5/; It, Fisher v. J. Dwight, £1 15/11; P. Bryant v. M. C. Batxxn, £2 8/; A. C. Purchas v. Hush. Mullins, £2 2/; B. G. B. Moss v. ttua Tapii, £34 6/2; a Fountney v. A. Bowers, £4 5/:; W. Gunsou and Co. v. H. 11. Martin, £5 16/8; Geo. Pirrit v. R. T. Way, £6 18/; J. 0. E. Jackson v. Leonard King, £2; Mrs K. Gray v. A. B. Stephenson, £7 1/0; John Dawson y. Sidney Hurrod, £1 15/; Upton and Co. v. Mrs Noyer, 15/; A. E. Tattley v. Mrs N. Howard, 16/6; I-lugli Wright v. Mrs CouTtnev, £1 2/7; A. Cleave and Co. v. W. H. Heywood, £4 10/; C. E. Hemus v. T. E. Meredith, £5 7/10; same v. J. G. Wilson, £6 11/tj- A. Cleave and Co. v. N. O'Halloran, £0; 'Hutchinson Bros. v. A. Davidson, £4 17/1; same v. J. Stewart, £2 15/11; same v. J Boggs, £1 5/9; Neil McLean v. F. J. Jones £7 10/; Hutchinson Bros. (Ltd.) v. E. Clare' £3 12/10; Roopc Bros. v. J. Griffiths, £2 5/; A. E. Tattley v. H. Wilson, £3 1/9; T Mitchell v. J. Stevenson, £7 8/; George Tiros v. B. J. Harlick, £5 10/10; D. Teed v Mis C. Andry, £2 8/3; A. E. Tattley v. C Connelly, £3 12/11; Adams and Co. v. D. OTveefe, £2 14/2; Baker and Co. v. William Ingle an d Co -' £3i) 10/; w - T - C G. Brown, £8 13/6; Briscoe and Co. (Ltd ) v. F. B. Kelty and Co., £lO IS/6; R. and W. Hellaby (Ltxl.) v. T. Smith, £1 2/5; same v. Messrs E. Henderson. £2 0/11; same v H Morris. £2 7/1; D. Teed v. P. <>oboro. £1 11/9; A. E. Tattley v. Manuel Boss 12/4; A. E. Tattley v. R. Rodgers, 10/' B Gerard v. J. Bellersley, £4 10/11; E. Gerald v. W. Hatfield, £lO 14/5; same v. A. Welson. £2 U/3; bamc v. C. Br □ a ton. £32 ■35/8.