S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XLI, Issue 71, 24 March 1910, Page 6

S.M . COURT.

(Before Mr C. C. Kettle, S.M.) Undefended —Judgment went for tile plaintiff by default in the following undefended cases.— The King v. Frederick V. "Williams, £11; X.Z. Acetylene Gas Co. v. T. Nightingale. £9 IG/; The King v. Eleanor L. Heabury, £1S 2/G; D.S.C. v. Miss Ella Shostrom, £2 12/10; Pallinger and Isaac v. i. 'E. ttensJSaw, £7 3/; James Klrker v Charles B. Nicholson, £-1; New Zealand ,Loaa and Mercantile Agency Co. t. p Robert Aeeott. £49 IT/-1; D.S.C. v. J. Heron, £8 0/0; U.S.G. v. B. M. Hansen, £2 10/3; D.S.C. v. J. Hei, £7 1/7; W. Meredith v. Henry Atkinson. £4 10/ (Judgment for £2 V); Jonathan Trevethickv. George Daniels, £6 2/11; D.S.C. v. J. R. Bowman, &> 9/8; . D.S.C. v. Edward Nathan, £1 14/10; D.S.C. v. Mrs R. Nelson, £1 13/; D.S.C. v. E. A. Andrews, 17/6; National Bank v. Thomas GlcdMil, £93 3/4; U. A. Colt-e and Co. v. I George J. Ward, £13 4/11; D.S.C. v. Mate Anania, £4 19/ti; G. A. Coles and Co. v. .1. Sinies, £4 13/8 (judgment for :t/S); ■Tames E. Klnnear v. Mrs. Agnes Rogers, £2 1/; J. 11. Hannan v. M. J. Farrtng*on, ' 10/; J. Harris v. Thomas Mackaniny, £9 1/; ■ James Baird v. J. Power, for possession of a tenement (jndgment for plaintiff by default, possession to be given within seven i day Mrs. K. M. James v. Miss Gertrude ; Power £1 5/6; Sarah Kennerley v. Herbert Klewellyn, £4 10/: A. Birckland and Son v. John MeCabe. £115 9/4; T. K. H. Cooke p. ! Mrs. X. McKee, £1 12/3 (judgment for £1 0/Sj; C. E. Richardson v. Henry McDowell, £1 7/; F. McKay v. Fred Stites, £5 2/; , George Mcßride v. John Brennan ' and Co., | £3 11/; Sargood and Son, Ltd., v. B. Harkness, £7 4/3; Emily Beamish v. Anaru Eketune, £5; Frederick McKay v. H. Treanor, j £1 4/; V. McKay v. Fred. Harris, i £3 3/5; A. O. Bowel) v. P. J. ilcGa-rald, £2 9/7; Clara Beatrice Windsor v. Alexander Henderson, £8 15/11; ! ■MeMath and Stebing v. Francois William ' lianey, £2 12/7; A. C. Purchas. v. Patrick McSherry, £15; Hutchison Bros.. v John W. Thomas, £-1 0/S; Miss H. Thome- I sou v. Mrs. Bridget Don, £1 19/; D.S.C. v. 1 John Ananla, £2 19/7: Catherine Humphrey t. Fred Humphrey, £34 12/10; Dr. Porter v. j A. J. Davis. £2 3/0; J. M. White T. H. W. j Ktnreh, £3 5/3; Dr. Porter 7. 3. Benion, I £o 5/; Acetylene Gas Company v. Howlett Bros., £2 2/: J. Dean, and Sons v. — Carpenter) £4 2/; Dr. Player v. Andrew Otto Tlior-bi-.ni, 18/6; M. A. l=o!Sas v. W. Wilson, £17 SAP; Benjamin Roberts 7. William G. Veart, 12/: Official Assignee v. W. Thompson, 17/; Same v. Mr. Tye. 10/3; .1. £L Hannon v. GA. Hastings, 10/. A Question of —George R. Grantley sued C. A, H. Chaniberlalii to recover £6 IS/, alleged to he due as -wages. Mr Moody appeared lor plaintiff, who was engaged, to drive- a hawking cart, for which ,ha was entitled, under the award, to receive £2 7/ per week, but, by agreement, was paid £2 6/. end now sought to recover the balance. The defence "was that the man had been, paid. In full. After hearing some evidence, the plaintiff agreed to a judgment for £5 9/6. which was civen.