LOOSE LEAF LEDGERS.
I (By Telegraph.—Own Correspondent.) WELLINGTON, this day. An important case having reference to loose leaf account hooks has just been decided by the registrar of patents, Mr. F. Waldegrave. The question to be decided was whether an application for a patent made by Mr. H. M. Douglas, of AVellington, had been anticipated] opposition to the granting of the patent being brought by Mr. F. W. of Auckland. The litigants are rival manufacturers of loose leaf ledgers, and j both appeared to give evidence. Air iHeiiry Hughes, counsel for the opponjeuts (instructed by Mr. Barnett of j Wellington, and Mr. JBasley-. of Auckland), produced numerous kinds of loose leaf ledgers, and explained them to the registrar. Messrs. Baldwin and Ravward (for the applicant) claimed that there were material differences between Douglas' ledgers and those cited as anticipations. The registrar decided that Douglas' application for a patent should be granted.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19060517.2.22
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 117, 17 May 1906, Page 3
Word Count
151LOOSE LEAF LEDGERS. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 117, 17 May 1906, Page 3
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in