R.M. COURT.-Yesterday (Concluded.)
(Boforo 11. G. Seth Smith, Ksi)., U.M.)
AITLICATIOXS !'OH JIK-HKAlliro,
Chaulks Atkik (Cousins and Atkin) v. Elliott.—The action was originally brought to recover tho price of n cjray sent to the defendant, a Whangarei settler, but which tho latter said ho received as agei|t for its salo. — Tlio plaintiff had been nonsuited, and Mr H. Campbell, on his behalf, now applied for a re-hearing on tho ground that material ovidonco had boon ilUcovorod Binoo thojudgment."-MrThoniooppQsodthoappli' cation.—His Honor declined to grant it, Taylor v, MacCormack. —Mr Tlieo. Cooper, in support of tho application, said that Mr MacCormick had paid £12 on these terms: That Mr Blades would assent to the re-hoaring; that at tho re-hoaring no evidence would bo taken; that tho judgment already given would bo reversed, and then judgmont ontored for tlio defendant without costs. DEFENDED CASES. Campbell v. Hill.—Claim, 80s, for rout.— Mr Thco. Cooi>er for plaintiff, for whom judgment was given. Fennell v. Dunfow.—Claim, £7 lls.—Mr Keetley for tho plaintiff. Tlio claim Vvas cstabjished.andjudgmentgivcnnccordingly.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18831123.2.33
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXI, Issue 4192, 23 November 1883, Page 3
Word Count
170R.M. COURT.-Yesterday (Concluded.) Auckland Star, Volume XXI, Issue 4192, 23 November 1883, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in