UNKNOWN

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1730, 3 September 1875, Page 2

UNKNOWN

[Bf.ure ?'. D. ii'euton, iiisq., E.M.) ' "CDC-J- CITT FOR PLAINTIFFS. - :i-. Koldsbip v. Andrew Hobertson {M» t 'OnbxMv for plaintiff) claim £10 12s .81 ti w^ • tor, costs :;-i 7s; Hancock and. Co. V. D ]Y2cije»H>*.a, ciairr> £11 14s 4d, ale and beerI Matia Scofcfc v. Henry Donnelly, claim £1 1 13s, goods. WM/EER MCCAtTL V. BAVID LYKCH Claim, £3 2s 6d. Mr J. B. Russell for plaintiff." This was a claim for rent, and recovery of 4 a tenements in Edffardea-sfcreefc. David Lynch «j-?nr»ied vbat the house was untenantable, >•.!.•? v/r.tsr came io ia all dircodona ami Mr Sims 'iho sgeat of the owner, woui.fl raot pat i-o much as a shingle on the -nor" ; oce stormy night I ijh<? house was Htewtiy flooded, the beds awMßliko dt'.clvß upou the water, and he was obliged to carry Sirs Lynch out of the house on bis back. i Mr Russell said th?.t if the honse vies in :-rach a state he should have left it, instead of which he stayed there Telve weeks after' the storm. Henry Sims stated tK <inf'irjfant took the honse in High-street ■„■'■'. .V-is- ?c shs Istol April last at 17a 6d pr- ?•/■.<>>;: >&i left oa the 17th June. _ He al'cv ■-J .■;=fi2 nn<- week on account of his con" :ic7cl'. la ie"i theJaoose! in a tihhy and .vv.o:t sbr:udnabl<; condition,;' and which cost; lr': - 7? <-- and 5i for repairs. T ':■ '■-, <y-.p'wzz-Se -•v'ers fail of old," bones, rags an '. ''•••' oir..r 'i. ok? boots, besides'"! Borne five baf^ :r -"' »;->'! pipi sbslk c Altogether th'.:f- -r-s-: - .v.-*.' — r -it rsbbish taken away. Mr Lynch ; :i?.y ■'■ X'lki--. ;/o;-.r Worsfeip,' respecting ti;t: _Hrt.Mr Rnss^-i1 ns'rl ~-o:'c fl^wes of dirt, as we.' as dcgreeE of ohs:-'»"'jf?. ■ ■" Mr Lyn?}. >?,.'& >j f^. T=-a? r-, y:----T»thole-ja13 the skylight!; "<sn<i S*icj "fcr*l'e r;..* d'bt raisst' have blow.:. i;?rr '...•,;- : r" r "ho.Jd 'oketofce' heard in Ms ibience., ,: Mr Lj -I- '^ ;':x;, ,v;• •, : :«-:! saidibaS . he Jioulr sho ':o"c.ee --s; *.."^i bie. Lit ic.r a ?nsa tol iivp -'n, hut ■■■•»*:• m.m Jin <vot in, it , I'w- ■■'■■■ --■. -.?]-'= __■ : .Ho-tt 2.-!-.0-.?i 'ma fconea. Wfci't' ■.'!•.■■•.■ icds'ov b bi..ae3 / i • ~'vJr '{'j's.'-'p -. I reTo:; i^a^- sny bcneß;, codd not Deli anyfchiEg about tiem. Tbf: C'Ozlt-j '-/■ •■'i-jr ».-.eighed the evideneej ■j&ve '•.tLiiwc'i*- or n^'Hiftiii £2 17s 6n ; .coats, £1 £M 0(2. " ■ ■•>.-!T.-_-V. H7i, ELLIOTT. 1.-,-.- ->o;; r.-.r ;-l;>J.-rJn tve M^ ftneksfo ?or: Tiii': -,?"?: -w at:i-i<?c >>'ii r,he balance. 0fi7.«,«0s '-n- ,effence '.iras tbca tbe plsiiitiff.ii^S c'csp^. ' tfii (,«••??» hrv:\iVk'if-' ?': .:>.'*acuhisry, the ; | Av-^tii nf -.■/rich. ■-■.-..-. c/jf*anted from t& ' i rr-ccxH =;' -•».ges. - "-vitr -Joy- 55.id the'defsoce ■ j. Tv-i:1 ''r;.p'''h:'.c, the.i--; wa»i.socgre^mentt-oth^l i fffjci, pud '"b/j 'jreakagcp of were j ■".c'ndoo.ir'J, and y.ot t-lie i"Bß'jlr of negligence. | 7.?- bsslreth iisicl lie 2beciA sfesw xhat the ; d^<-eds.ni y/as noli liable. ' ; . . •. . .- s \~•± 1i:>:r-i f^aylt)-, rr\cr;hi7iist, deposed.that a>~ vTii? ■■-■^p.ged by Mr Eiliot to do certsia j wcrkc ;r» thepnbiic works department at the' « vailiyc>:7 workshop. When he had done the" ; "•.:"i: /Mr iiLaodcnr.-l^, overseei*, stated his ! fcL' ' f.jdttt asd requested him to receipt it 1 (Us-- ;i ICy 6d) which he refaaed to; he was 1 te. "f.vs besa psJ<« monthly but he never' Mr. Hesketh : That io a 3lander on the I Qcverament, . . .■. | To Mr. Hesfceth: Th«:^e tvas 303. stopped. } en a former cecasinn, buEheTas.notinformed; of the stoppage until after ha had signed the p-vv-shesfc.- 16 was the custom en the works, iii arse xne;? to receipt t h.c pay-sheet without >«viug any knowledge of jmy deductions,^ which wera made afterwards. He objected: to the 30a. being deducted, and had worfs with Mr. JSliott aboiit it, and 5 gettia'G; no ' redress, he gave nosice. Mr. Passmcw,. he believed. -Ktis at the head of the departosnt, but lie could net; tell wvat he did. {T^eft sitting.)