Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRESS COMMENT ON THE NOTE.

NO UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE.

UNITY OF THE EMPIRE

LONDON, ,September 29

The “News-Chronicle” interprets Sir Samuel H'oare’s Note as plainly meaning that Blriitain would not be committed unconditionally to sanctions against Germany because Franco sought to prove that Germany had broken the disarmament clauses of the Versailles Treaty; that Britain would also not bo committed if Austria voluntarily coalesced with Germany ; and, moreover, she would not ho committed to military or naval action in disputable cases such as Mem el, where the determination of the real aggressor might he very difficult.

The “Daily Mail” hopes the Note is a prelude to greater aloofness from Continental; entanglements-, land the abandonment of sanctions. It adds: “It would be a real gain if henceforth Britain made the British Empire our league, with London instead of Geneva as-the headquarters for determining the policy.” “The Times,” in a. leading article, says: “Nobody who has followed the Empire’s evolution can he, under any illusion regarding its instincts for peace and justice. The Dominions are becoming more conscious of' the danger of a world in which the great nations do not possess such voice as theirs for the choice between war and peace. Dominion parliamentary debates and their delegates’ attitude in Geneva revealed a unanimity previously incredible. “It is also inconceivable, that the Dominions or any class in Britain should disagree regarding the necessity for

revision of imperial defences, although it is unnecessary to decry their inadequacy in the present situation. Rearmament does not involve a change of foreign policy, but at present, unhappily, there can be neither peace nor flreedom from '-anxiety ivliile those countries which appreciate these blessings least are allowed to be strongest.”

FRANCE COMPLETELY SATISFIED

“COULD BE MORE DEFINITE.”

PARIS, September 29

An official message states that tho Government is completely satisfied with Sir Samuel Hoare’s note. It adds: “Nothing could be more definite.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19351001.2.27.9

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 55, Issue 299, 1 October 1935, Page 5

Word Count
315

PRESS COMMENT ON THE NOTE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 55, Issue 299, 1 October 1935, Page 5

PRESS COMMENT ON THE NOTE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 55, Issue 299, 1 October 1935, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert