Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TANGLED RELATIONS.

A BIGAMY CHARGE FAILS. (Special to the “Guardian.”) AUCKLAND, October 30. Tangled relations arising from marriage ceremonies were described in tlie Supreme Court, when Minnie Clamest IJorvocks was charged with bigamy and making a false declaration to the liegistrar of Marriages at Auckland that she was not married. The chaiges arose from a- form, of marriage which accused went through with George Lai 1 at Auckland in- 1921 whereas she bad previously married M dhaiu Arthui Meredith in England in 1912. Both Meredith and accused had been married prior to 1912. The death of accused’s first husband was not disputed, but whereas Meredith (now a- tailor in Christchurch) stated he had learned of nis first wife’s death some years before marryin rr accused, the defence was raised that accused had leason to believe on Meredith’s own admission that Jus first wife was living at the time of the second marriage ceremony. Meredith, in evidence denied lie told accused his former wife was living. Accused was described as a s2iinster when she married him, and ho was tnen unaware of her previous irarnage. He went to the war with the Twentieth Reinforcement, and on returning ho inquired for lier without success, and did not see her again until the present 2>roceedings started. Accused in the witness box affirmed the accuracy of statements which she had 'made to the police. She said that while awa-v with the Expeditionary Force Meredith wrote saying lie was having a- good time in England with his wife and "had no intention of returning to New Zealand. Meredith’s mother had told her after the marriage that he had a wife living in. England, and Meredith had confirmed, this, hut said tliat because of something she had done his wife had no claim on him. When she married Earl in 1921, she believed the 1912 ■ ceremony was not marriage, because Meredith then unci a wife living. Accused’s maiden name was Horrocks. ; , , Tho jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19291031.2.72

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 50, Issue 17, 31 October 1929, Page 7

Word Count
333

TANGLED RELATIONS. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 50, Issue 17, 31 October 1929, Page 7

TANGLED RELATIONS. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 50, Issue 17, 31 October 1929, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert