Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM TO PEERAGES.

PREVENTION OF SCANDALS, Decisive recommendations designed to frustrate any possibility of trafficking in the promotion, of speculative claims to dormant peerages are contained in the report of the Select Committee on Peerages in Abeyance, issued recently, states a London newspaper. " It has been suggested that what is called £ traffic' exists, or may exrst, in the promotion of speculative claims .to peerages in abeyance," says the report "That such a suspicion exists we are inclined to believe, but with what founj dation in fact it is impossible to say. The report then refers to the changes which take place among the co-heirs to such peerages, and states that, ' ) f industrious and watchful genealogists take note and advantage of such occasions, the matter is neither one for surprise nor censure. It is only in the very unlikely case of an open scandal I that anyone, except the parties concerned, can be affected, but in such an event it must be admitted that the credit of the peerage is likely to suffer. We think that the most effective remedy for any mischief of this kind will be found, and is incidentally involved in an effective curtailment _of the possible field of speculative claims." . The committee recommend that noabeyance should be terminated which began more than 100 years before the presentation of the petition, and that no petition should be allowed to proceed where the petitioner represents less than one-third! of the entire dignity. "When the Committee for Privileges is satisfied that any arrangement entered into between the petitioner and any co-heir is tainted with any imprcH priety no report should be made by it on the petition except that such arrangement is not shown to have been a proper one." The same regard, it is urged, should be had to a petitioner for the termination of an abeyance—his character, position, service, and fitness —as in the case of a subject on whom a peerage is conferred. It is pointed out that there are many scoresi of possible baronies of great antiquity not actually accounted for. There are at present 51 baronies in abeyance, in which the necessary sittings could be proved, of which 11 are under attainder, and at least eight have already been the subject of petitions for termination, but without success. It is thought that 34 are now liable to be claimed. The recommendations, if adopted, will have a farreaching effect on many contemplated claims to ancient dormant titles. Their effect half a century ago would have been to disqualify a number of women who have since become peer- » esses in their own right. The members of the committee are! the Marquis of Bath, the Earl of Kintore, Lord Stanley of Alderley, Lord Hvlton. Lord Pvedessdale, Lord Sumner, Lord Muir Mackenzie, and 1 Lord Askau with, ...._ •

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19270428.2.69

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVII, Issue 10903, 28 April 1927, Page 7

Word Count
468

CLAIM TO PEERAGES. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVII, Issue 10903, 28 April 1927, Page 7

CLAIM TO PEERAGES. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVII, Issue 10903, 28 April 1927, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert