Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DEADLOCK

THE WIRELESS STRIKE, OWNERS' TERMS REJECTED. ATTITUDE OF THE OPERATORS. (Per Press Association—Copyright.) (Received This Day, 10.40 a.m.) LONDON, Feb. 14. Protracted negotiations between representatives of the striking wireless operators and the shipowners ended in a deadlock, with no immediate prospect of settlement, according to the Chairman of the Operators' Association, who said the employers simply repeated their terms and gave the Association seven days to accept, threatening, in the event of refusal, to offer certain conditions to men individually. The failure to agree was confined to questions of wages and the re-instatement of strikers, the employers insisting that the men resume at reduced rates and be re-instated only as the employers were able to offer service.

The Chairman concluded: 1300 ships are now going to sea without qualified' wireless operators; over 1900 men are striking. The Wireless Telegraphist's Association in a statement says the operators are prepared to submit the whole dispute to the Industrial Court, but are not prepared to prejudice their case, before the Court by accepting totally unjustified reduction. The statement points out that the wireless operators accepted reductions in 1922 and 1924, additional to any reduction accepted by other maritime workers.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19260215.2.38

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVI, Issue 10670, 15 February 1926, Page 5

Word Count
198

A DEADLOCK Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVI, Issue 10670, 15 February 1926, Page 5

A DEADLOCK Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLVI, Issue 10670, 15 February 1926, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert