Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAKE COLERIDGE POWER.

PROFIT ON YEAR'S WORKING.

(Per Press Association.)

WELLINGTON, June 21. The financial returns from the Lake Coleridge hydro-electric power plant for the year ended March last show very satisfactory results. The gross revenue was £51,373 as against £45,831 m the previous year. Owing mainly to increased wages and the more frequent ' running of the steam stand-by plant to, meet overload conditions, the working expenses rose from £17,759 to £21,341 and interest, and depreciation, charges rose, from £24,487 to £26,585. The net result of the year's working is a profit of ' £3447, after paying £7946 towards depreciation to provide for renewals, as required. This profit has been taken m reduction of the accumulated losses during the first four years' operations. __ The maximum power-house load has increased dnring the year from 9420 h.p. to 9880 h.p., and the output from 33,010,130 units to 36,309,580 units. The rated capacity of the power-house plant is 8000 h.p., so that it has been running daily at heavy overloads, up to 20 per cent. This has been necessary owing to the urgent demand for power and the difficulty during the war ih making necessary extensions. The weekly average load factor of the power-house has increased from 59.9 to 61.4, and is thus very high indeed, again due to Ihe large demand for power at night as well as m the daytime. . • The saving of coal m the district m consequence of the use of this power has, the Department states, been very substantial. To have generated 36.000,000 units m a large modern steam plant would have required 48,000 tons of coal, worth from £100,000 to £120,000, but to have generated this amount of power m the numerous small engines as previously employed would have taken three or four times this amount of fuel, or a larger outlay m oil, kerosene, or petrol.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19210623.2.3

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9543, 23 June 1921, Page 2

Word Count
309

LAKE COLERIDGE POWER. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9543, 23 June 1921, Page 2

LAKE COLERIDGE POWER. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLI, Issue 9543, 23 June 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert