THE DRUCE-PORTLAHD CASE
Received December 3, 10.58 a.m
LONDON, December 2. In the Druce case, Caldwell, on bemp; cross-examined, said that he was not aware that there was a tombstone in the Londonderry cemetery to tlie memory of his daughter Caroline. it there was, it must have been erected by his brother William, ■ since- Caroline Was buried at Aghavea. If the Highfate grave were opened, and the comn showed an inscription that Druce was buried there, it would not affect his testimony, as the inscription must have been placed on since the coffin was deposited there. A gardener who had been employed by the fifth Duke deposed that Draco's photograph did not resemble the Duke.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19071203.2.35
Bibliographic details
Ashburton Guardian, Volume xxix, Issue 7350, 3 December 1907, Page 3
Word Count
115THE DRUCE-PORTLAHD CASE Ashburton Guardian, Volume xxix, Issue 7350, 3 December 1907, Page 3
Using This Item
Ashburton Guardian Ltd is the copyright owner for the Ashburton Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Ashburton Guardian Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in