Crinoidea from the Reefton Group (Lower Devonian), New Zealand
Rudolf J. Prokop
By
Geological Survey of Czechoslovakia [Received by the Editor, March 19 1969]
Abstract
Crinoid remains from Yorkey Creek, Reefton, New Zealand, are determined and described: Megistocrinus reeftonensis n.sp. is proposed. The stratigraphical significance of the Reefton crinoids is discussed.
Introduction
In 1961 Professor H. W. Wellman of Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, collected a number of crinoid fossils from a boulder of calcareous argillite (S3B/641, grid reference 372223) in Yorkey Creek, near Reefton, in the south-west part of Nelson province, South Island, New Zealand. The collection of fossils comprised a single external mould including some calical plates and arms with pinnules, as • well as other moulds of fragments of stems. Specimens other than isolated columnals and calical plates are unusual for New Zealand, and Professors H. B. Fell* and P. Vella (Departments of Zoology and Geology, Victoria University of Wellington) sent latex casts of the material to me for taxonomic determination.
The specimens illustrated are in the type collections of the Geology Department, Victoria University of Wellington; numbers given below refer to the above collections.
Systematic Descriptions Subclass GAMERATA Wachsmuth and Springer, 1885 Order MONOBATHRIDA Moore and Laudon, 1943 Superfamily PEREICHOGRINIDAE Austin and Austin, 1843
Genus Megistocrinus Owen and Shumard, 1852 Megistocrinus reeftonensis n.sp. (PI. 1, PI. 2, Figs. 1-3) Description: The calyx is large, greater in width than in height, composed of thick, large plates which become gradually smaller in a ventral direction. The plates are gently arched, ornamented at the surface by rather densely distributed, rounded, radial ribs, which are apparent especially in the plates of higher circles. The round stalk facet is slightly exposed
with BB above the surface in the basal part ofthe calyx. Only two (of the three) BB are preserved; they are narrow and long. RR are typically hexagonal in shape. RR and, to a lesser extent, the solid Brßr and IBrßr are often deformed, or broken by pressure; this indicates that neither number nor mutual position of plates can be inferred with certainty.
The tegmen is partly visible on the holotype, and consists of numerous small polygonal plates.
Arms are long, slender and arched, showing rather sparse dichotomous branching; they are markedly biserial. In the proximal part of the arm, brachials are relatively broad and low, narrowing gradually towards the distal part. In this direction their height also slowly increases. Axillares are lacking; the arms of higher orders branch so that brachials of their inner rows are inserted wedge-like between brachials of lower-order arms. Food grooves are broad, covered by two rows of small hexagonal plates. Well-preserved are the long, thin, articulated pinullae, which start by a small triangular facet.
Material: Holotype VEI; this is a mould of a specimen compressed almost flat, with the posterior part of the calyx, arms, and tegmen visible as well as fragmens of arms; original shape uncertain. Paratype VE2; mould of parts of arms of another specimen.
Remarks: Megistocrinus reeftonensis n.sp. is closely related to the younger species Megistocrinus depresus Hall, 1862, from the Hamilton Group, U.S.A. The two species are similar in the size of the calyx and the position of its plates, in the composition of the basal part of the calyx with projecting BB and stalk facet, and in composition and shape of the free arms. The two differ in size of the calyx plates; Megistocrinus reeftonensis n.sp, has conspicuously large IBrßr and the anal plate X is much larger than RR. The latter characteristic distinguishes the New Zealand species from all other known species of Megistocrinus. M. reeftonensis also differs from M. depresus Hall by having different ornamentation of calyx plates, i.e., by distinctly rounded radial ribs all over the surface of the plates. Most frequently the American species has on the surface of the plates fine grains, sometimes in lines or coalescent in places, forming a sort of shagreen ornamentation; if the ribs are developed, the grains are very fine and concentrated only at the margin of the plates.
Superfamily HEXACRINITICEAE Übaghs, 1953 Family HEXACRINITIDAE Wachsmuth and Springer, 1881 Genus Hexacrinites Austin and Austin, 1843
Hexacrinites sp. (PI. 3, Figs. 1-4)
Description: Golumnals low, disc-like or slightly oval, thickness about one half of radius. A minute circular axial canal is present, its edge being raised slightly above surrounding parts of the columnal. Peripheral part of columnal also raised. Upper and lower surfaces covered with fine radial striae (crenelae) which show as fine indentations at the periphery.
All coherent stem fragments consist of regular alternations of three internodal columnals and one nodal columnal. Internodals low, with smooth columnar walls. Nodals higher and broader, with walls rounded or tapered to periphedral edge; more mature nodals show denselypacked fine spinose bases of cirri.
Material: VE3, 4, 5. More common than Megistocrinus reeftonensis n.sp., represented by stems and columnals.
Crinoidea gen. et sp. index. (PL 4, Figs. 1,2)
Two fragments are too incomplete to be determined generically.
A fragment of a small column (PI. 4, Fig. 1, VE6) has regularly alternating nodals and internodals with rounded walls, nodals thicker than internodals, small slightly protruding bases of cirri sparsely scattered on nodals.
The second fragment (PI. 4, Fig. 2, VE7) is the basal part of the column of a large crinoid with fastening appendices preserved. Stem poorly preserved, showing only a few smooth, very low columnals. Appendices long, unbranched, touching each
other at their proximal ends, diverging fan-wise, gradually tapering distally, composed of cylindrical segments which are low near the stem and increase in height distally. Each segment has regularly arranged minute grains on the peripheral surface. The form of the appendices suggests attachment to a soft bottom which is in agreement with the type of sediment forming the matrix.
Discussion
Previous works on the geology and paleontology of the Reefton Group were reviewed by Wright (1967). Brachiopods from the Lower Reefton Quartzite and the Reefton Mudstone of Suggate (1957) have been correlated with the upper Siegenian or lower Emsian (Lower Devonian) of the Rhine region, in western Europe (Allan, 1935; Gill et al., 1966).
In spite of wide stratigraphic ranges, the association of the two crinoid genera found in the Reefton Group is indicative of the Devonian period. Hexacrinites ranges from the Upper Silurian to the Upper Devonian; it is found especially in the Middle and Lower Devonian, where its distribution is cosmopolitan. Megistocrinus occurs quite abundantly from the Lower Devonian to the Lower Carboniferous; it is found most abundantly in the Middle Devonian of the U.S.A., with several species represented in beds which correspond to the Givetian of Europe. The record of the genus Megistocrinus in the Reefton Group of Lower Devonian age in New Zealand is important and is in agreement with present ideas based on other fossil groups (Gill et al., 1966) on the age of the Group.
Acknowledgments
I am indebted to Professors H. B. Fell and P. Vella for sending latex casts of the Reefton crinoids to me for study. For assistance given by A. J. Wright, Geology Department, Victoria University, Wellington, who read the manuscript, I am especially grateful. The photographs are by L. Frantova and H. Vrstalova, Geological Survey of Czechoslovakia, Prague. All photographs are taken after whitening the specimens with ammonium chloride. Not retouched.
References
Allan, R. S., 1935. The Fauna of the Reefton Beds (Devonian), New Zealand. New Zealand geol. Surv. paleont. Bull. 14: 1-74, pis. 1-5. Gill, E. D. et al., 1966. The Brachiopod genus Maoristrophia Allan (Lower Devonian, Strophomenacea) redescribed. Proc. R. Soc. Viet., 79: 355-61, pi. 39. Goldring, W., 1923. Devonian crinoids of the State New York. N.Y. State Mus. Mem. 14.
Suggate, R. P., 1957. The geology of the Reefton subdivision. New Zealand geol. Surv. Bull. 56. WachsmutHj C. and Springer,, F., 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard Coll. Mus. comp. Zool. Mem. 21-22. Wright, A. J., 1967. A review of the Devonian of New Zealand. Proc. intern. Symposium on the Devonian System. Calgary, Vol. 1: 631-36.
Dr Rudolf J. Prokop, Geological Survey of Czechoslovakia, Prague.
* Now at Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TRSES19700718.2.2
Bibliographic details
Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand : Earth Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 3, 18 July 1970, Page 41
Word Count
1,348Crinoidea from the Reefton Group (Lower Devonian), New Zealand Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand : Earth Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 3, 18 July 1970, Page 41
Using This Item
In-Copyright Materials
In-copyright materials are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. This means that you may copy, adapt and republish this material, as long as you attribute both the author and the Royal Society of New Zealand.
In-copyright taxonomic materials are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution No-Derivatives 4.0 International licence. This means that you may copy and republish this material, as long as you attribute both the author and the Royal Society of New Zealand.
For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this periodical, please refer to the Copyright guide.