Clothes & the Woman
The purposes of wearing apparel arc three in number. It would seem that they may be placed in the following order of importancey (1) for womento bring admiration to the hearts of men and envy to the hearts of other women; (2) for the great dressmaking industry—provide meat, mansions, and motorcars; (3) for men—to provide a shield against the weather. The case may thus be summarized: Clothes and the Woman, Trade fit for Heroes to live on, and Arms and the Man. Some people appear to think that man is the slave of woman, and woman is the slave of her dressmaker. It would, perhaps, be more accurate to say that man and the dressmaker arc more or less fixed stars, while woman is an eternally moving one, alternately swaying and being swayed by the other two. The dressmaker started the vogue of the neck, breast, back, and legs being thrown open to public view. There success was for him. But docs anyone suppose for a moment that he would succeed if he tried now to close this exhibition? No. And that is where woman is in turn successful. You may disagree with the above. You may insist that it was woman who decided, and always decides, the nature of her garments, and that the dressmaker is but a pawn in her game. You may say that when Eve ate the apple she was naked, and that all she thought fit to wear thereafter was a fig-leaf, and that now she is slowly, but surely, making her way back (not to say forward) to that fig-leaf. Well, so be it. I shall not argue about it. I only hope I shall live long enough. Apropos of Eve, there is one great truth that her daughters never forget, and her sons too often lose sight of : the nude is Eden undefiled, while the demi-nude is the Tempter with all his guile. Some men prefer it that way; others are too old to bother anyway.
It has been said that the clothes of I the woman proclaim the man. This is one of those stray epigrams that have strayed somewhat from the truth. We all know the story of the woman who told her husband that she proposed going to town to buy a couple of new gowns and a fur coat, and asked what he thought of the weather prospects, whereupon he replied, “Rain, hail, sleet, snow, and thunderstorms.”
But did his forecast of such a terrible tempest stop his spouse from going to market? On the contrary. She had read and gloated over the Bargain Sales, and nothing short of death would deprive her of the joy ' of spending her husband’s money at these sales. And that, incidentally, is where the outfitter is top-dog.
Moreover, what does she buy? If she is a siren of generous proportions. she probably buys a feathered hat and a white crepe-de-Chine din-ner-gown. She does not buy that hat to look like a bird, or that gown to look like an angel. She buys them because she is told that they are “so ridiculously cheap.” If she is a tiny sylph, she will probably buy a fur coat that stretches to her feet and would hold two of her, not because she wants to look like a teddy bear, but because it is “almost given away.” 'VT'ou may think I am wrong. You * may point out that the woman’s clothes do proclaim the man, for the reason that a rich man can spend proportionately more money on clothes than a poor man. It may seem so —to the uninitiated. But, believe me, a beautifully dressed woman only indicates a prosperous dressmaker, and not a prosperous husband. The present-day virgin (woman) is much more concerned about trimming herself than her lamp. She has discovered the simple fact that the more charmingly she trims herself, the more easy will it be for her to find the man who will not only pay for the trimming, but also open the door to such Earthly Paradise as her heart craves for. One of those statistician fellows asserts that if all women were compelled to dress alike, all the hospitals and 99 per cent, of the private houses in the world would have to he turned into lunatic asylums. He may be right. It would probably be as demoralising for one sex as for the other. We may take it that the odd one per cent, are those houses occupied by the blind, the deaf, and the dumb. It is a well-known adage that “Knowledge is Power.” Men agree with it. Women do so also—when the knowledge is about some other woman. It is, however, the adage “Dress is Power” that appeals above all others to women. Yet We should not be frond of the clothes zee wear; They're all second-hand, as we know; 'Tor a plant or an animal, insect or bird. /fas worn them before, long ago. —By “Celt,” in “Woman.” iniitiiiiinniintiiiiiitiitiininiEiiiiiiiiiitiiiutiiißniittiißiiiiininninnnniiiiiiiiiiiiinnßiiniitiiiiiiiiituuiiHiniiiiiitiiiuiiuii
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/LADMI19260901.2.35
Bibliographic details
Ladies' Mirror, Volume 5, Issue 3, 1 September 1926, Page 27
Word Count
837Clothes & the Woman Ladies' Mirror, Volume 5, Issue 3, 1 September 1926, Page 27
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.