Page image

G.—2

PANIKAU No. 2 BLOCK. In the Validation Court at Gisborne. In the application of Edward Murphy, of Te Arai, sheep-farmer, claiming validation of twentyfive contracts for the sale of the freehold in certain undivided shares and interests of Natives in Panikau No. 2 Block. Tuesday, the 4th Day of September, 1894. Upon reading the application filed herein, and upon due proof of service thereof upon the objectors named in the said application, and upon reading the documents exhibited, and hearing the evidence adduced before the Court, and upon hearing Mr. De Lautour of counsel for the applicant, and there being no objectors present or represented, the Court cloth hereby order, declare, and decree as follows :— 1. It is declared that the several contracts made by the following Native owners in the said Panikau No. 2 Block —that is to say, Perenara Waharoa, Heta Kiore, Tiopira Potango, Kihirini Tupara, Apikara Tupara, Hohua Kawhia, Wiremu Kahure, Hoani Piwaka, Peta Kahure, Atareta Maitai, Euihi te Ngara, Karauria te Aomarama, Mere Kahure, Hirini Tupara, Eutene Kuhukuhu, Hana Kara, Tapita Kawhia, Kamariera Kahure, Mere Haihai, Hori Karaka, Karaitiana te Amaru, Eipeka Moeone, Pipi Ana Kuhukuhu, Henare Euru, Eaniera Taki—for the sale of their respective freehold interests in the said Panikau No. 2 Block, are contracts invalid and incapable of being enforced without the assistance of this honourable Court by reason of their having been respectively made not in accordance with the requirements of the statutes then in force (but now repealed) regulating the sales of the said interests in the said block. 2. It is further declared that the said several contracts are contracts which, irrespective of form, had they been made between Europeans concerning lands held under Crown grant, would have been valid and binding contracts, capable of being enforced in the Supreme Court. 3. It is further declared that the said contracts were not in any respect contrary to equity and good conscience. 4. It is further declared that the said several contracts were fully and perfectly understood at the time they were entered into by the contracting parties, and were fair contracts for reasonably sufficient and lawful considerations at the time, and under the- circumstances under which they were made. 5. It is hereby ordered and declared that the said applicant, Edward Murphy, is entitled to an estate in fee-simple in possession, free from encumbrances, in a block of 912 acres, more or less, part of the said Panikau No. 2 Block, situated in Block XIV , Uawa Survey District, to be hereafter known as Panikau No. 2b, being all that parcel awarded by the Native Land Court of New Zealand on or about the 3rd day of February, 1887 (on a division then made between sellers and non-sellers), to the several Native persons, the said sellers, whose sales to the applicant are hereby validated, and being all that parcel known as Panikau No. 2b, containing 912 acres, as the same is more particularly delineated on Plan No. 356, deposited in the District Survey Office, Gisborne, and which said parcel of land is shown on the plan indorsed hereon, and thereon edged with red lines, to hold the said parcel of land to the said applicant, his heirs and assigns absolutely 6. It is further ordered and decreed that all other titles to the said parcel of land, known as Panikau No. 2b, above particularly described, shall henceforth be void, and of none effect, in so far as they affect the Panikau No. 2b Block, whether the same title be now vested in the said applicant or in any other person whomsoever, and that the registration of all the said other titles shall be cancelled, and of none effect, in so far as regards the said Panikau No. 2b Block. Witness the hand of his Honour George Elliott Barton, Esquire, Judge, and the seal of the said Validation Court. G E. Barton, Judge.

PANIKAU No. 3 BLOCK. In the Validation Court at Gisborne. In the application of Edward Murphy of Te Arai, sheep-farmer, claiming validation of thirtynine contracts for the sale of freehold in certain undivided shares and interests of Natives in Panikau No. 3 Block. Tuesday, the 4th Day of September, 1894. Upon reading the application filed herein, and upon due proof of service thereof upon the objectors named in the said application,'and upon reading the documents exhibited, and hearing the evidence adduced before the Court, and upon hearing Mr De Lautour, of counsel for the applicant, and there being no objectors present or represented, the Court doth hereby order, declare, and decree as follows: — 1. It is declared that the several contracts made by the following Native owners in the said Panikau No. 3 Block—that is to say, Peta Parata, Mokena Pahoe, Tepora Euru, Arapeta Eangiuia, Katerina te Mihi, Paki Tuatara, Hira Taruke, Marara Paku, Eawiri Karaha, Tiopira Potango, Arapeta te Plau, Eopiha Tamararo, Emi Miria Pu, Karauria te Aomarama, Hare Nahonaho, Eutene Kuhukuhu, Atareta Maitai, Hana Kaara, Katerina Moko, Euruhira Manutuke, Irihapeti Tuahoanga, Taraipine Taike, Heneri Puanga, Tame Pahura, Hone Meihana, Paki te Amaru, Matenga Tamaroki, Harawira Tupara, Kerehona Piwaka, Witana Puanga, Iritana Pukepuke, Hare Manawapau, Karaitiana Ngeungeu, Hepeta Maitai, Mehaka te Ngahue, Karanama Moepuku, Hera Eangiuia, Henare Euru, Hare Noanoa —for the sale of their respective freehold interests in the said Panikau No. 3 Block, are contracts invalid and incapable of being enforced without the assistance of this honourable Court, by reason of their having been respectively made not in accordance with the

12

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert