H.—2,

23

APPENDIX III.—TABLE B— continued.

Batio to Liabilities, per £1, of Name of Society and Branch. Present Value of Future Contributions to Benefit Funds. Benefit Fund! Total Assets. Surplus. Deficiency. Causes of Surplus or Deficiency. I.O.O.F.— continued. Grand Lodge of New Zealand —oontd. Alma Loage Wallace „ Ridgley „ Kawakawa „ Gladstone „ Matdura „ Kaeo „ Orient „ Hawko's Bay „ Sproydon „ Orepuki „ Hope of Hastings „ Grand. Lodge Funeral Fund s. a. 18 5 16 11 14 10 18 7 16 5 17 4 18 4 18 3 19 0 18 6 18 7 19 7 15 9 s. a. 6 10 5 4 1 11 4 3 5 3 6 8 3 8 1 10 1 0 s. d. 25 3 22 3 16 9 22 10 21 8 24 0 22 0 20 1 20 0 18 6 19 8 20 3 21 10 s. cl. 5 3 2 3 2 10 1 8 4 0 2 0 0 1 s. d. 3"3 A, B. A, B. A, B. A, B. A, B. A. 1 1 0 8 6 1 i"o 0 4 V o"3 1 10 A, B, D. A.O.F. Auckland District — Court City of Auckland „ Pride of Parnell .. „ Zealanaia „ Pride of Onehunga „ Pride of the North „ Robin. Hood „ Northern Wairoa „ Eureka.. „ Pride of Newmarket „ Nil Desperandum „ Royal Oak „ Star of the South „ Star of Helensville „ Victoria „ Queen of the North „ Excelsior „ Kihikihi District Funeral Fund 11 10 9 6 12. 8 13 5 12 1 15 3 13 3 13 9 13 6 13 6 14 5 14 0 13 1 15 5 15 5 15 3 14 11 9 5 7 6 15 10 6 9 2 1 3 4 4 7 2 8 2 8 3 4 3 0 1 6 2 7 0 6 1 0 0 5 0 6 0 6 3 9 19 4 25 4 19 5 15 6 15 5 19 10 15 11 16 5 16 10 16 6 15 11 16 7 13 7 16 5 15 10 15 9 15 5 13 2 s"i 0 8 0 7 4 6 4 7 0 2 4 1 3 7 3 2 3 G ± 1 3 5 6 5 3 7 4 2 4 3 4 7 6 10 E,H. t E,H. + E, H. E, H. E,H. E,H.§ E,H. E, H, J. E, H. E,H, J. E, H, J. E, J. E, J. E, J. E, J. E, J. E, J. Canterbury United District — Court Star of Canterbury „ Queen of the Isles „ Pride of Courtenay Thistle of the Forest „ Woodford „ Pride of Richmond „ Papanui District Funeral Fund 9 5 6 11 14 11 14 3 14 9 15 1 14 10 10 3 6 10 10 4 6 1 4 1 3 7 .3 10 1 8 6 7 16 3 17 3 21 0 18 4 18 4 18 11 16 6 16 10 i"o 3 9 2 9 1 8 1 8 1 1 3 6 3 2 E. E. A, B, D. E. E. E, J. E, J. E. United Otago District — Court Pride of Dunedin „ Pride of the Lake „ Enterprise „ Robin Hood „ Pride of the Leith „ Bruce „ Star of the Dunstan „ Pride of Oamaru.. „ Star of Tuapcka .. „ Pride of Alexandra „ Havelock „ Roxburgh Star of the South „ St. Anarews „ Excelsior District Funeral Fund I 6 8 12 7 12 3 10 0 14 5 11 0 11 6 14 11 5 11 17 5 11 4 17 2 12 10 14 5 15 11 6 1 15 1 5 7 11 9 3 6 4 6 3 10 7 3 4 5 5 7 5 6 6 0 3 i 6 4 4 2 4 6 4 6 21 9 18 2 24 0 13 6 18 11 14 10 18 9 19 4 11 6 22 11 17 4 20 6 19 2 18 7 20 5 10 7 1 9 l'io 4"o C 6 1 1 5 2 1 3 0 8 8 6 E, J. A, B, D. E, H, J. E, H. E, G, H. E, G, H, J. E, H. E, G, H, J. E, H, J. all o"g 2Q o'io 1 5 H. E, H. 0*6 9"5 E. Court Coromandel 12 1 14 9 26 10 6 10 C, D. Court Southern Cross 8 5 8 2 16 7 3 5 E, H, J. U.A.O.D. Pioneer Lodge Mistletoe „ Star of Anglesea „ Ohoka „ Timaru „ Trafalgar Aucklana „ Albion „ Linden „ .. % .. 12 0 12 7 13 10 12 1 12 5 12 8 12 6 13 10 12 10 4 5 3 9 3 4 2 9 2 10 2 4 3 5 2 6 3 4 1G 5 16 4 17 2 14 10 15 3 15 0 15 11 16 4 14 2 3 7 3 8 3 10 5 2 4 9 5 0 4 1 3 8 3 10" E. E. E. E, J. E. E, J. E."~ E. E. * Information imperfect. The valuer tNot explainable by valuer. I Surv bezzlement of funds. II The surplus ii fund. *♦ The deficiency has since bee: suggests that tb )lus contingent ( i the court sick fu a increased by th< le deficiency is on correctness md is more thai e embezzlemeu probably due of value assif swallowed up of funds by a i to misapplied to iavi by the deflci trustee. •opriatiou of estmonts. iency in the c benefit funds. § Also eiclistrict funeral