E.—IB
9
Summary of Results.
A reference to the table of results here given will show that, whilst there is an increase of 383 in the number who have passed the standards, there is a decrease in the number classed in Standard 1., and an increase in the numbers classed in Standard 11., 111., and IV. The decrease in Standard V. is abnormal, and arises from the fewness of the number passed in Standard IV. last year, which left few candidates for Standard V. this year. The general results of the standard classification appear to me fairly satisfactory. The table of results shows in detail for each school the actual results of the late standard examination ; and, in the tabulation, I have shown the full classification of each school as determined by this examination. Comparison of the number of passes with the number of candidates in each school would, in many cases, be unfair, for reasons which I must briefly state. The average age, attendance, ability, and past success of children vary in each school; and, with these varying quantities, the results may be expected to vary. Again, the standards, as pointed out in my last report, are not so arranged as to make it necessarily an even year's work one to the other ; and the majority of candidates, unless of considerable age, cannot pass year by year consecutively without a break somewhere. So that a class in a good school may pass Standard I. at, say, between seven and eight years of age, and many of them may pass Standard 11. between eight and nine, and possibly Standard 111. between nine and ten. The difficulty has, however, increased year by year, and by-and-by the strain becomes too great; and probably, as candidates for Standard IV. or V., many of them fail on the first attempt. The teacher should therefore exercise a wise discretion in not attempting too much with candidates who are under age. The following is the average age at which candidates are now presented for the respective standards: 1., eight years seven months; 11., nine years nine months ; 111., eleven years ; IV., twelve years two months ; v., thirteen years two months ; VI., fourteen years one month. In giving year by year a return of the passes made in each school, it appears to me essential that the classification as determined both by the last and by former years' work should be shown conjointly. By associating the past results with the present, the true educational status of the school may be fairly judged. If it be found that the number classed in standards, and fairly classed as to each standard, compares favourably with the number of age for the work done, it is evident that, notwithstanding apparent want of success in the candidates last presented, they are in fact satisfactorily classed, owing to the good work of previous years —indeed, the candidates may have previously passed a standard much in advance of their age. Take, for example, the Waihenga School, in which this year only nine candidates were successful out of twenty-one ; nevertheless, the status of the school is remarkably high, and it has been famed for years as one of the best taught schools in the district. For these reasons I think it undesirable to give a percentage return of the passes in each school. I think a comparison of the figures in columns (c) and (d), and an inspection of the classification in column (c), would give the best idea which can be obtained from numerical standard results of the working condition of a school. But numerical standard results are not everything, as I shall endeavour to point out later on in my report. Still, they are of great value, and approximate very closely to a true test of the efficiency of the work. The following table shows the total results of the standard examinations : — Presented. Passed. Failed. Passed, per cent. Standard I. ... ... ... 897 ... 710 ... 187 ... 79 „ 11. ... ... ... 890 ... 781 ... 109 ... 88 „ 111. ... ... ... 802 ... 624 ... 178 ... 78 „ IV. ... ... ... 640 ... 436 ... 204 ... 68 „ V. ... ... ... 223 ... 122 ... 101 ... 55 „ VI 143 ... 77 ... GQ ... 74 3,595 2,750 845 765 Management.—l observe considerable improvement in the management of most of the schools in this district, but there are defects in some of them to which I wish to call attention. The work of the lower classes might be more thoroughly supervised by the head-teacher, who should be very exacting 2—E. Ib.
(a) (») w (d) .a «| JJ W a f* in) Class of Schools. o fc|f ■a §.s o $> g Standards in which Classed. II O 02 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. 1,580 706 360 104 Wellington City Hstrict town 'ountry iural 8 9 17 9 430 192 51 27 3,439 1,725 8621 2401 i 3,074 I 1,480 720 214 2,019 1,043 553 151 1,972 1,021 504 153 482 256 118 40 564 294 142 89 469 235 155 32 291 161 71 28 112 45 27 10 54 30 11 4 1,934 1,008 492 161 Total tills year ... Total last year ... 43 43 145 128 6,266 5,525 5,488 5,020 3,766 3,369 3,050 3,208 896 928 1,029 921 881 797 551 271 194 214 99 77 3,595 3,217 2,750 2,377 Increase 17 741 468 397 452 -32 108 84 280 -20 22 378 383
Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.
By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.
Your session has expired.