Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE GUARANTEES

DIFFICULTIES WITH RUSSIA PACT AGAINST AGGRESSION (United Press Assn.—Elec. Tel. Copyright', LONDON, July 9 “Difficulties with Russia began when the negotiators began to list the States to be defended against aggression,” says the diplomatic correspondent of the Times. “The Soviet agreed to the inclusion, of Belgium, Rumania, Poland, Greece and Turkey, provided that Finland, Estonia and Latvia were included. “We said that in that case we must consider our special interests in the maintenance of Swiss and Netherlands independance. “Tiie Soviet replied that if Western Europe were brought more clearly into the picture, they must consider means of ensuring immediate help to the West, and suggesting opening negotiations with Puland and Turkey. “The 'Soviet also defined direct and indirect aggression in terms so farreaching that, in the British view, they amounted to potential interference in tiie internal policies of other States. “The points outstanding are not disclosed, but it is known that- agreement has been reached on the fundamentals ol' a three-Power defensive pact, on the principle of military co-operation if certain States are victims of aggression, on the provision against a separate armistice or peace, on the need for immediate military conversations, and on the way in which reference should be made to League principles.” Baltic States’ Nightmare Editorially, the Times says: “The Baltic States, especially Finland, have a nightmare of Russians advancing with rifles in one hand and leaflets in the other, and staying indefinitely in order to scatter Communist propaganda. “The Baltic States must realise that if a Uerman-Russian war breaks out, they will inevitably be drawn in. The Daily Telegraph's diplomatic correspondent says an immediate three-Power mutual assistance pact would he less satisfactory as a deterrent against aggression than the type of general treaty hitherto proposed, because Russia would be able to remain neutral in the event of a German attack on her neighbours. Furthermore, Poland and Rumania would be unable to obtain Russian aid, while Britain and France would be geographically ill-placed to assist them. Swiss public opinion, reports the Geneva correspondent of the Daily Telegraph, has been stirred by publication of the fact that guarantees for Belgium and Switzerland were discussed in Moscow. Opinion overwhelmingly opposes any diplomatic reconciliation with Russia.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19390711.2.51

Bibliographic details

Waikato Times, Volume 124, Issue 20853, 11 July 1939, Page 7

Word Count
369

THE GUARANTEES Waikato Times, Volume 124, Issue 20853, 11 July 1939, Page 7

THE GUARANTEES Waikato Times, Volume 124, Issue 20853, 11 July 1939, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert