THE CASE FOR ITALY.

Waikato Times, Volume 119, Issue 19914, 17 June 1936, Page 9

THE CASE FOR ITALY.

(To the Editor.) Sir “Hyltonla” states the case for italy. He does not say, because it would be false, that Italy was not an “aggressor.“ lie does not say, because it would be false, that Italy has not shamelessly and without disguise committed international hrigandage. lie asks that Italy shall not sufl'er for flagrant crimes because: (1) She was that treated fairly at Versailles (Abyslsinta, incidentally, was not a party): I (2) she needs outlets; (3) she has the [power to take; (4) England and other countries did not keep promises made theforc the League was in existence. iThese reasons mean that those who :have the power, whether bound by “treaty or not, are justified in taking what they can seize. There would he a better case for Japan it‘ she decided liu annex Australia and New Zealantl. {There was once a belief that the last, war was fought to the and that right. should replace might in international politics. \\'h.\~ "ityltonia" should apologise for the “atroritics” 1 fat] to 500. if your l‘ul‘l‘CSllttlltlDlli LlCt‘itlt‘l‘i to commit. illirazrn burglary it will he writ that he shuuiti not cumhrr thr rourt pro—rantings with his initial \\'i‘tJlt,‘—l‘H against. outsiders nor with apology for

the “loans employed. These will not umll him in a house of justice. it. seems clear that Italy should not. he nllowml to 110le stolen properly. 1.‘n1.1l she has 11 change of heart. MlO Gllfllllll. in my opinion, lw oxncllml from the Luuguc of .\‘atlons.——l um, L‘ll‘., l-‘. .\. DE LA MARE. llamlllon, June 10, (Tu the Editor.) Fir,—"llylluniu" is In 1m coup llll‘lllll‘tl for his lollm- in lu-Llay's lssuu of ”I“ \\':tikulu ’l‘imvs. \\’u‘ hum hmuwl tun Illllt'h l‘l'nln thn Abyssinian Sid" nt‘ llu- qllustlun, :nnl llu! smut! laulit-s haw IH‘OII usvtl tLHIny us wot-v, used ulmut immunity in curly 191’:— 1:). ’l‘h!‘ sm'i‘vt parts of 19L”) n'm'o hl‘nlu-u l‘l‘uul'lllllj—E l.u\\l't|m'c uml tho .\rulis as “‘l‘” as lluly. Sn nun-c again “'l‘ 500 lht- t‘rulls Inqlny of what “'ls sun'n in 191.") um] uftvl'. lu it'll we \wnl In \\;l|~ over Uni--inuny scrapping :1 Iron!) with lh'dg:luxn. .\t 1“? Poul-t: llonh-rcnm in 191') WP. ‘lhv British Ill‘l’lih‘. cln'vrt‘ully lu-ukv nmuy prumlsvs. ltuly hml just claims. i and they wul‘c not l‘ult‘illml. lll‘l‘ fore» must Hult‘smun, ll “UL'U. is t‘cuturml lln to—xluy's lllll‘ll‘l‘. He looks nuL mu tyrant. that he is suppnsvtl to lvc. llt‘ 'ls quite benevolent. ls nut. his "aimllcnlln'? \\'l|nl. must \\c think nt‘ 'lhlli .\‘vlunsto. who t'orsuok hix pmvpl!‘ in lllt'il' lmui‘ ul‘ nI-ml. :linl ll“" >mnnnv<L tnguther with tho lrcumry thost, to rljl‘f‘lgll |lnl'l.~“.’—l mu, l‘ll',_ [ ll\'l'.\'l‘l.\. t llumilton, Juno 1.).