Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CRAZE OF THE “ BIG SHIP.”

“It is obvious that, under existing conditions, the construction of the great Cunarder could not be financed without State assistance, which, in the. minds of those best qualified to judge, must be extended even to her eventual operation, at any rate, unless and until the North Atlantic passenger traffic resumes its post-war peak' level,” states the trade publication, Modern Transport.

“It is apt to be forgotten that the construction in 1907 of the Lusitania and the Mauretania, each of 32,000 tons, with a speed of 25 knots, was made possible only through Government assistance, and the procedure may well have inaugurated that world-wide policy of State subsidy from which this country now appears to be - the chief sufferer. These were the largest ships of their time, although a few years later they were dwarfed by their White Star rivals, the Olympic and the ill-fated Titanic, of 40,000 tons each.

“What induced the White Star Line, in 1910, to adopt the ‘Big ship’ policy will probably never be known, but it is on record that Herr Ballin, of the Hamburg-America Line, having vigorously protested against it, proceeded to go one better by constructing the Imperator (now the Berengaria), of 52,000 tons; the Vaterland (now the American Leviathan) of 50,000 tons; and the Bismark, (now the Majestic), of 50,000 tons. Meanwhile, to operate with the Lusitania and the Mauretania, the Cunard had, in .1914, constructed the Aquitaua, of 47,000 tons.

“Now, twenty years later, the White Star Line, which was thus responsible for launching the ‘Big Ship’ policy, is pinning its faith to the moderate-sized cabin-class ship of the Britannic and Georgic type of 27,000 tons each, whilst the Cunard is engaging in the production of the super first-class liner. Now, the price of Government assistance in the construction of the giant Cunarder is the practical amalgamation of these two supposedly competitive lines, and it is patent that, if, as is generally supposed, she is put into service in 1935, the entire resources of both lines will be required to keep her in operation.

“Experience on the Atlantic has shown that, unless a weekly sendee of similar ships can be worked, no service can bo really pro.\table, and on this account both the Empress of Britain and the new Cunarder will need sister ships. In short, the history of the ‘Big Ship’ has not been a particularly happy one, and during the last few years it' has been nothing less than disastrous. Indeed, acute observers on both sides of the Atlantic claim that the day of the ‘Big Ship’ is past.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19340313.2.29

Bibliographic details

Waikato Times, Volume 115, Issue 19203, 13 March 1934, Page 4

Word Count
435

THE CRAZE OF THE “ BIG SHIP.” Waikato Times, Volume 115, Issue 19203, 13 March 1934, Page 4

THE CRAZE OF THE “ BIG SHIP.” Waikato Times, Volume 115, Issue 19203, 13 March 1934, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert