Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IRISH OATH BILL

DEBATE IN THE SENATE. LABOURITES DIVIDED. BRAVADO NOT BRAVERY. (Official Wireless.) (Received June 3, 12.30 p.m.) RUGBY, June 2. On the second reading debate on the Removal of the Oath Bill in the Irish Free State Senate, divergent views were expressed by two Labour senators. Senator Johnston warmly supported the Bill, which he declared did_ not violate the treaty with Britain either in letter or in spirit. He criticised Mr De Valera, however, for not first approachng the Senate in regard to the Bill for an expression of their views. Senator Farrell said he believed the Bill would be the death of the treaty. A satisfactory agreement could, he believed, have been reached through negotiations, and the failure to enter upon which such negotiations was a sign of weakness —and was not bravery, but bravado.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19320603.2.64

Bibliographic details

Waikato Times, Volume 111, Issue 18653, 3 June 1932, Page 7

Word Count
138

IRISH OATH BILL Waikato Times, Volume 111, Issue 18653, 3 June 1932, Page 7

IRISH OATH BILL Waikato Times, Volume 111, Issue 18653, 3 June 1932, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert